Healthcare Consulting Services
PO Box 1230
Grantham, NH 03753
ph: 716-550-1106
btruax
Tip of the Week is on vacation this week as we celebrate Independence Day in the US and our neighbors celebrate Canada Day. Enjoy the holidays!
While statistics are important in patient safety, it is stories that get peoples attention. Perhaps the most dramatic story I ever heard was from a nurse involved in an incident where a child was given Bicillin intravascularly, causing a death. That nurses world was turned upside down by that event. The irony is that our system failed her. Our system put her and many other nurses and doctors and patients in a position where a substance could be inadvertently given via the wrong catheter/route.
It has been over a year since Joint Commission issued aSentinel Event Alert about catheter misconnections and administering substances via routes they were not intended to be administered. Recently, the issue has received considerable attention again.
Last month, the Wisconsin State Journal had a multipart series on medical errors and incidents and focused especially on cases of catheter misconnections or administering substances via the wrong route. That followed a fatal case last year in which a nurse had criminal charges filed after giving a drug intended for epidural anesthesia intravascularly. And there are previous similar cases where criminal charges were filed against nurses in cases where the system made them vulnerable to be at the sharp end of an unfortunate incident.
The Joint Commissions Sentinel Event Database had nine cases at the time it issued its Sentinel Event Alert in April 2006. But the problem of catheter misconnections and wrong route drug/fluid administration is much more common. The US Pharmacopoeia reporting system (a voluntary reporting system) has over 1200 reports of cases in the past nine years in which a substance intended for one catheter was inadvertently administered into another catheter. The cases involve almost any catheter you can think of (substances intended for feeding tubes being given intravenously or via dialysis catheter, intravenous medications being given intrathecally, hypertonic intravenous contrast agents being given intrathecally for myelography, bladder irrigation solutions being given intravenously, intramuscular medications like Bicillin being given intravascularly, IV fluid being injected into a tracheostomy cuff, blood pressure cuffs being hooked up to IV lines, and many more examples).
ISMP/FDA Medication Safety Alerts have been issued at least as early as 2001, some of which includevideo presentations .
One of the salient problems, of course, is that the design of the systems allows 2 things to be connected that were never intended to be connected. The most successful safety interventions in any industry are forcing functions, that is designs that force someone to do something or not to do something. This particular issue is one that should be amenable to use of such forcing function solutions.
A major problem is use of the luer connections in the various types of tubing, catheters, or syringes. Good design would prevent a feeding tube or syringe with feeding solution from being physically connected to an IV catheter. Many facilities have moved away from purchasing any feeding systems that utilize luer connections. One of the biggest barriers has been getting the device manufacturing industry to come up with standards for connections on the various devices.
European healthcare organizations seem to be a little farther along in addressing the issues. In fact, the National Patient Safety Agency in the UK just issued a Patient Safety Alert on March 28, 2007 on Promoting safer measurement and administration of liquid medicines via oral and other enteral routes . This addresses design of equipment and labeling of tubes and syringes.
But there are multiple other contributing factors noted by both Joint Commission and ISMP. One of the biggest problems is that the various catheters and tubes may be in close proximity to each other, without clearcut labeling or other identification. Color coding of various lines/devices has been suggested but without a standard across facilities use of color coding could lead to unintended consequences. When color coding is not feasible, it may be possible to flag high risk medications by other means, such as wrapping them in foil. It is imperative that one always trace a tube or catheter or line from the patient to the point of origin before connecting any new device, line, infusion or other substance. This should always be done in proper lighting (many times a caregiver does not want to wake a sleeping patient so makes the connection in a dimly lit room).
The issue needs prominent attention in education and training sessions and should be part of annual competency inservices/evaluations. Including lines and connections may be an important part of change of shift communications or other handoffs.
Importantly, facilities should make monitoring of these systems a priority. It would be a good process to add to your patient safety walk rounds and is an excellent process to conduct FMEA (failure mode and effects analysis) around.
Keep your eyes and ears open. We will likely see and hear more about this issue over the next year.
PrintCatheter Connection Errors/Wrong Route Errors
In our April 16, 2007 Tip of the Week we discussed falls with injury, with particular emphasis on what the first responder to a fall needs to do. We pointed out that the responder needs not only to assess the patient for injuries but also to do an assessment of the reason for the fall. Having a checklist to help the medical responder is a good way to ensure that the injuries are attended to and the cause of the fall is considered.
In response to the fall, there are a number of other tools that can be useful in the assessment of potential injuries. Many of these are already used in your emergency rooms. Good examples are the Canadian CT Head Rule, the New Orleans Criteria (for head injury), or the Ottawa C-spine Rule. Most of these rules and their algorithms can be downloaded for use on a PC (such as theMedical Algorithms Project) or handheld PDA (such asEM Rules).
TheCanadian CT Head Ruleis an excellent rule for determining which patients should get a CT scan of the head after minor trauma. However, it does not apply to patients who have a bleeding disorder or who are on anticoagulants. The following case is a good example of some of the unique considerations in anticoagulated patients.
An elderly patient with a cardiac condition was on full-dose heparinization while an inpatient and had an unwitnessed fall in the hospital one evening. He did not lose consciousness and was alert and fully oriented when the medical resident examined him after the fall. He had a mild ecchymosis on his right forehead but no focal neurological signs and no evidence of trauma elsewhere on the body. Because the patient was fully anticoagulated, the resident ordered an emergency head CT scan, which was normal. No changes were made in his heparin regimen. The following morning the patient was more somnolent than usual and a repeat CT scan showed a sizeable subdural hematoma that required surgical evacuation.
Weve included this case because it shows that the timing of a CT scan may be important in the patient who is anticoagulated. The accumulation of a subdural hematoma after minor head trauma may be slow in a patient on anticoagulants. So particularly in a patient who is already hospitalized and being monitored regularly, one might consider delaying the head CT for several hours if the initial neurological examination is normal. However, that implies that the neuro checks will indeed be carried out as ordered. Weve often seen in that past that there is a tendency for neuro checks to be overlooked when the patient is asleep which is exactly when neuro checks are most important!
The same may apply to bleeding in other spaces in patients fully anticoagulated. A good example is retroperitoneal bleeding, which may present with no signs until a drop in hemoglobin is found or flank ecchymoses are noted.
Heparin, coumadin, and other anticoagulants are all high risk medications and your organizations should have comprehensive guidelines and protocols for their use.Joint Commissions 2008 National Patient Safety Goals include taking steps to reduce the risk of harm in patients on anticoagulants. While the focus of that goal is to help ensure that patients are adequately and safely anticoagulated and avoid the frequent adverse drug events often associated with coumadin or other anticoagulants, a comprehensive policy should include recommendations about minor trauma in the anticoagulated patient as well.
PrintFalls in Patients on Coumadin or Other Anticoagulants
Many hospitals are still struggling with their root cause analyses of serious adverse events. One of the problems is just getting started promptly. One of the keys to good incident investigation is obtaining all the factual evidence as soon as possible. Particularly when it comes to interviewing witnesses, it is important to remember that memory of the event becomes less clear with passage of time and those memories may even be changed by other events, conversations, etc. It is extremely important that we understand how the participants in the incident perceived the unfolding situation and events as they occurred, rather than reinterpreting them after knowledge that the outcome was adverse.
Therefore, each hospital should have a Serious Incident Response policy and checklist to help guide them in their response to a serious incident. A link to a sample serious incident response checklist is at the end of this tip of the week.
Obviously, the individual assigned responsibility for each task may vary from organization to organization. But having the task listed on a checklist and and individual designated helps everyone remember what needs to be done.
The serious incident might meet the Joint Commission definition of a Sentinel Event or the state health department definition of a serious reportable event but you should also consider even near-misses as meeting the definition if there was potential for a serious adverse patient outcome. On receiving the incident report, the designated individual (usually a risk manager) should immediately discuss the incident with the medical director, director of nursing and director of quality improvement to decide whether the Serious Incident Investigation Team/RCA Team should be convened. The risk manager (or other designated person) should contact the supervisor of the area where the incident occurred to ensure that all potential witnesses are identified and then schedule a meeting of the Team as soon as possible (usually within one day). In those cases where a witness will be unavailable to be interviewed in person, arrangements can usually be made for that person to be interviewed by phone.
The chart of the patient should be secured and working copies made for use by the Team. Similarly, any equipment or devices involved should be sequestered. That is to ensure that the equipment is available for the investigation and also to ensure that any potentially faulty equipment is not used for another patient.
We believe that the patient and/or family should be notified early that errors may have occurred and that the incident is being investigated. Weve long been believers in being very forthright with patients/families and telling them when there were mistakes made in their care. Subsequent research and other experience certainly seems to bear out that such an approach and an apology are important when mistakes or errors did impact on the outcome. The details and the apology, of course, cannot be given until the RCA is complete and all contributing factors known. However, our experience is that patients and families appreciate candor and should be told that an investigation is ongoing and that they will be made aware at some point of at least the general outcome of that investigation. It should be made clear to them that the investigation is being done to help ensure that similar events do not occur in the future. The individual who speaks to the patient or family should usually be the one with the best pre-existing rapport. That is usually the attending physician but may under some circumstances be someone else in the organization. If it is awkward for the attending physician to speak to the family, then the medical director is an appropriate individual to speak to them.
Most of the other items in the check list are self-explanatory (mostly notification to various agencies and bodies of the incident occurrence). Some state Department of Health offices require notification of certain events within 24 hours. Even if that is not a formal requirement, a good general rule is to notify them of any event that is likely to attract press attention. That way the state department is not taken by surprise if an inquiry is made and they are able to respond that they are aware of the incident and the ongoing investigation.
The last item is very important and often overlooked. Caregivers undergo a variety of deep emotions when one of their patients is harmed, particularly when they feel they may have contributed in some way to that adverse outcome. So each organization should have some mechanism for providing needed support and assistance to any physicians, nurses, pharmacists, etc. that may have been directly involved in the incident or had been actively involved in the care of the patient.
See a sample Serious Incident Response Checklist.
PrintSerious Incident Response Checklist
A patient is in need of an emergency CT scan one night. There is no nurse available in the radiology suite so the ER resident accompanies the patient for the CT scan. The patient is in need of sedation for the scan and the resident inadvertently administers vecuronium IV to the patient, resulting in respiratory arrest necessitating rescuscitation.
A patient is undergoing a surgical procedure in the OR and the surgeon asks the anesthesiologist to give IV antibiotic. The anesthesiologist reaches into the anesthesia medicine drawer, where all the medications are kept, and pulls out a vial of vecuronium thinking it was the antibiotic and adds it to the IV bag. On arrival to the post-operative recovery area it is noted that the patient is not breathing well and she requires intubation.
We also previously mentioned a case (June 19, 2007 Tip of the Week) where an unintended consequence of CPOE led to inadvertent administration of a neuromuscular blocking agent to a patient.
Though these three cases were near-misses that did not result in patient harm, they illustrate the potential life-threatening dangers of medication errors with neuromuscular blocking agents. Neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) are high-alert medications in that permanent injury or death may occur as a result of inappropriate usage. An outstandingreview of NMBA safety issues, contributing factors, and potential solutions issued by the ISMP Canada appeared in the Spring 2007 publication of the Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses (CACCN). The article provides numerous case reports of individual NMBA incidents and points out many of the key contributing factors. It draws heavily on observations and recommendations from the September 22, 2005ISMP (US) Medication Safety Alert. If you facility/organization is looking for a good place to begin doing Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), the NMBA safety issue would be a great place to start, using the key points elucidated in these two articles.
NMBA incidents turn up in all areas of the hospital, not just ICUs and ORs where you might anticipate their occurrence. Sometimes a major contributing factor is continued use of an NMBA after ventilation is discontinued. Other times it might be continuation of an order for an NMBA when a patient is transferred to another level of care (good medication reconciliation should help avoid this). But look-alike/sound-alike names can be a major contributing factor. Norcuron (vecuronium) has been mistaken for Narcan, vecuronium for vancomycin, atracurium for Ativan, etc. In other cases, look-alike packaging has been a major contributing factor. In other cases, the NMBA has been in unlabelled syringes or unlabelled vials. And lack of understanding of the nature of NMBAs and their life-threatening potential is often a contributing factor.
There are multiple measures that may be taken to minimize the risk of an NMBA-related incident in your organization. Restricted access to NMBAs is very important. Restricting their floor stock to areas where mechanical ventilation is easily available, such as ICUs and ORs and ERs, is one step. However, in reading the CACCN/ ISMP Canada review, it is striking at how supplies of NMBAs turn up in the most unexpected places (eg. an anesthesiologist from a nearby OR, for convenience, had placed a vial of an NMBA in a refrigerator of a neonatal nursery where it was confused with vials of vaccine). So while restricting access is important, there clearly must be other safety measures taken.
In those areas where there must be stores of NMBAs, they should be segregated from other medications. That would, for instance, prevent someone from reaching into an anesthesia medication cart for an antibiotic and inadvertently pulling out an NMBA. And you should already be avoiding unlabeled syringes/vials/etc. as part of your Joint Commission patient safety activities. The ISMP Canada article also stresses the importance of prompt disposal of any unused NMBA from an patient room as soon as they are discontinued.
Appropriate warning labels are an extremely important safety measure for NMBAs. The ISMP Canada article lists several potential warning labels and color coding. A very good article on ways to optimize the effectiveness of warnings is in theAugust 2006 ISMP Newsletter.
Storage of NMBAs in automated dispensing machines can be especially problematic. Probably most important is only storing them in areas where they are clearly needed. Where needed, they should be kept in single access drawers. But there needs to be a special warning that the NMBA should not be used in patients who are not intubated/mechanically ventilated. Such a message could be delivered in those automated systems having the capability of messaging when an NMBA is selected for removal from a drawer. Similarly, the type of CPOE error noted earlier might be avoided by programming in an alert ensuring the patient is intubated/ventilated when the physician enters an order for an NMBA.
Other measures that might be used include standardized order sets, protocols for use, independent double checks before administration, use of bar-coding, education/training, and availability of point-of-service informational resources.
Of course, one needs to consider the unintended consequences of all these solutions as well. The most important one would be inavailability of an NMBA at a time it is needed for an emergency intubation. One suggestion in the ISMP Canada article for outside the OR was sealing the NMBA in intubation kits or anesthesia kits so access in only available once the intubation kit is opened.
Lastly, one of theAHRQ M&M Conference cases from a few years ago happened to be on an NMBA incident and it had 2 terrific downloadable videos addressing some of the communications issues in that case. It is well worth reading and watching the videos.
Again, consider adding NMBA Safety to your list of things you look for in your Patient Safety Walk Rounds and consider doing a FMEA on NMBA use in your organization.
Update from our November 2007 Whats New in the Patient Safety World:
In our July 31, 2007 Tip of the Week dedicated to errors in use of neuromuscular blocking agents (MNBAs), we recommended this is a good issue to address in FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) in your organization. Susan Paparella, from ISMP, did exactly that in a recent issue of Journal of Emergency Nursing. The ED staff had recognized NMBAs as high-alert drugs and were contemplating their removal from ED stores, to be replaced in kits prepared for rapid-sequence intubation. FMEA is especially useful in such situations where change is to take place, because it helps identify potential unintended consequences. The article nicely describes how you do a FMEA exercise and provides examples for scoring probability and severity and use of a hazard scoring matrix. She also lists 10 other problems commonly encountered in emergency rooms that could be candidates for FMEA.
Paparella, Susan RN, MSN Failure Mode and Effects Analysis: A Useful Tool for Risk Identification and Injury Prevention. Journal of Emergency Nursing. 33(4):367-371, August 2007
Many of the most famous disasters in industry history have followed equipment or facilities maintenance activities, whether planned, routine, or problem-oriented. Well-known examples include Chernobyl, Three-Mile Island, the Bhopal chemical release, and a variety of airline incidents and oil/gas explosions. It is unknown how often maintenance activities contribute to medical incidents but, given the similarity of systems in medicine to those in other high-risk industries, it is likely that there are many cases in which maintenance errors contribute to adverse patient outcomes.
James Reason and Alan Hobbs in their 2003 book Managing Maintenance Error. A Practical Guide do an outstanding job of describing the types of errors encountered in maintenance activities, where and under what circumstances the various types of error are likely to occur, and steps to minimize the risks.
Omissions are the single largest category of maintenance errors. Omissions are especially likely to occur after interruptions or distractions. We frequently lose our place when performing a series of actions and then either unnecessarily repeat a step or omit a step or steps altogether. Omissions are also especially prone to occur near the end of a sequence of steps. This may be part of the premature exit phenomenon where one is already thinking about the next activity and leaves out a step in the current activity.
The book has an excellent discussion of error-provoking factors that come into play at both the individual level and the team level, including how to recognize them and how to deal with them. It has a particularly good discussion of violations (which are intentional deviations from standards) and the reasons for them and a useful approach that one company took to reduce them.
Don Normans work on design of systems is cited and the importance of involving end-users in the equipment purchasing phase is emphasized. This, of course, helps the organization help identify some of the safety issues that will arise with such new equipment. Hospitals and healthcare facilities need to adhere to that principle more often. They especially stress the end-user role in understanding equipment having multiple modes (that is, controls do different things depending upon what mode the machine is in), another issue frequently lacking in healthcare settings. Automation surprises (such as this mode confusion issue) are frequently mentioned as root causes in the aviation safety literature but probably occur as often in healthcare.
A section on omission-provoking features more than justifies buying this book. It includes an annotated task step checklist that will help your organization identify omission-prone tasks and better manage them. It also includes a discussion of the characteristics of a good reminder (many of these characteristics are incorporated into the ISMP guideline on good lablels for high-alert drugs that we discussed in last weeks Tip of the Week).
In healthcare, we talk about the importance of reporting near-misses and other issues proactively to help prevent errors and adverse outcomes. We usually stress the importance of developing anonymous reporting systems or error-reporting hotlines. This book describes and interesting method probably not widely used in healthcare. It describes the MESH (Managing Engineering Safety Health) system. MESH is a sampling tool given to randomly selected frontline workers to rate weekly (or monthly) a number of factors affecting the local workplace environment of the more general organizational environment. The resulting cumulated local factor profile allows identification of those factors occurring with sufficient frequency to help direct limited resources to areas in which ROI is likely to be high and help prioritize safety and quality goals. This book also has a good description of just culture (encouraging that the vast majority of errors reported are not punished but continuing to take action in the rare cases where reckless behavior occurred) and a very good description of the attributes of a successful reporting system. And it ends with a great discussion about the nature of safety culture and the resilient organization..
The book also has the overview of human factors, description of various human error types, and models of organizational accidents that youd expect of any James Reason book. It gives real-life examples of incidents from several industries. Many of our big three issues (failed handoffs or other communication failures, failure to buck the authority gradient, and failure to heed alarms) are contributing factors in those examples. But they really emphasize some other aspects that we think about less often in healthcare but clearly need to integrate into our thinking.
Quite frankly, most of the lessons in this book apply not just to maintenance activities but to any process or procedure involving multiple steps. The caveat that steps near the end of a maintenance procedure are most likely to be omitted (premature exit) or that violations tend to occur frequently when under time pressure to complete a task certainly applies to many things we do in healthcare, not just equipment maintenance. The same issues could just as easily apply to a surgical case in the operating room or the delivery of chemotherapy on a medical unit.
PrintRole of Maintenance in Incidents
In our June 5, 2007 and June 12, 2007 Tip of the Week columns we discussed medication-related patient safety issues in ambulatory surgery settings. Joint Commission is finding less than full compliance in ambulatory surgery on several medication-related goals (eg. medication reconciliation, labeling medications and solutions, do not use abbreviations, and look-alike/sound-alike drugs).
The April 2007 issue ofUSP Patient Safety CAPSLink examined medication errors in outpatient surgery, based on data collected from the MEDMARX reporting system. For adult patients, nearly 70% of the medication errors in ambulatory surgery were in the administration phase. They point out that many of the drugs in ambulatory surgery units are not prepared or reviewed by pharmacists, thereby omitting a potential patient safety defense. They also note, as we previously did, some of the issues around inadequate medical records, time pressures, etc. that are more frequent in the ambulatory surgery setting. Computerized physician order entry (CPOE), a tool with great potential for reducing medication errors, is seldom available to or used by physicians in the ambulatory surgery setting. The article provides several recommendations for reducing outpatient surgery medication errors.
Look-alike/sound-alike (LASA) medication errors continue to be a problem in all healthcare settings and ambulatory surgery is no exception. Lists of problem-prone LASA drug name pairs are available throughJoint Commission andISMP . ISMPs August 9, 2007 Acute Care Newsletter has a good discussion about name confusion errors. It highlights some of the actitivies ongoing to reduce problems related to drug name confusion and notes an upcoming summit on the issue. It provides several practical steps that healthcare facilities may take to minimize the risk of LASA medication errors. The FDA also has had aName Differentiation Project that encouraged drug manufacturers to use tall man letters in their labeling of certain drugs. And one of the 9 Patient Safety Solutions recently published by theWHO Collaborating Centre for Patient Safety focuses on LASA Medication names. The latter is well-referenced and highlights barriers and possible uninteneded consequences along with many practical recommendations.
Each facility should have a list of targeted name pairs it will focus on and have a mechanism by which it will revise/update the list and disseminate the information and education to all members involved in ambulatory surgery activities. Examples of drug name pairs that might be encountered more frequently in ambulatory surgery might be: Amicar/Omacor, Darvon/Diovan, Anzemet/Avandamet, Celebrex/Celexa, Diprivan/Ditropan, ephedrine/epinephrine, fentanyl/sufentanil, Foradil/Toradol, heparin/Hespan, hydromorphone/morphine, Inderal/Adderal, Ketalar/ketorolac, Lasix/Luvox, MS Contin/oxycontin, Narcan/Norcuron, Paxil/Plavix, tizanidine/tiagabine, Zantac/Zyrtec.
Use of CPOE (with special alerts for potential LASA issues) or preprinted orders may be helpful. Requiring use of both the brand name and generic name when prescribing may also be helpful but is difficult to implement and sometimes has the unintended consequence of introducing additional errors.
Requiring the indication for any ordered medication may help prevent a LASA error. In addition to the dosage form, drug strength, route of administration, and complete directions, knowing what use the drug is intended for may help a nurse or pharmacist avoid a LASA error.
Use of Tall Man letters for LASA pairs on labels or on computer screens, etc., has been suggested as a solution. Examples of Tall Man lettering are: VinBLAStine/VinCRIStine or HydrALAZINE/HydrOXYzine. USP is conducting a survey of provider organizations to see the impact of Tall Man lettering on medication safety. Other techniques to highlight potential LASA-risk might include flagging with color, boldface, name alert stickers, etc. (but beware there is no current color standard for LASA drugs). Separate storage of one of a LASA drug pair in a different part of the pharmacy/facility may be useful (but beware of unintended consequences). Automated dispensing devices may be especially problematic when it comes to LASA drug pairs, particularly when more than one drug is stored in the same compartment. Some of the newer devices allow for programming alerts that might alert a nurse of a potential LASA drug.
Involving a pharmacist in the process is a very important step that few ambulatory surgery sites currently utilize. And other more general practices, such as avoiding verbal orders, remain very important in avoiding LASA errors.
And formulary management is important. LASA issues should be considered any time a new drug is being considered for addition to the formulary. Another consideration is stocking different strengths of a potential LASA pair (eg. dont stock 2 mg/ml strengths for both drugs).
Most importantly, monitor the practices in your facility as part of your QI activities. Just as you monitor for unacceptable abbreviations, or use of high-alert medications, you should monitor for use of the LASA risk drug pairs youve chosen on your list. And, obviously, encourage reporting of any new events or drug pairs that arise.
By the way, ISMP has updated its list of high-alert medicationsso as you put together your LASA list, you might review/revise your high-alert medication list, too.
PrintMore Medication-Related Issues in Ambulatory Surgery
Weve talked previously about the costs associated with various complications, such as urinary tract infections, post-stroke pneumonia, etc. Average costs for such complications have been estimated as below:
Urinary Tract Infection $ 3,000
Pneumonia after Stroke$15,000
Adverse Drug Event $ 6,000
DVT dx and rx $13,000
Fall with Injury $34,000
Ventilator-assoc. Pneumonia $40,000
Decubitus $500 to $40,000
MRSA infection $27,000
C. diff infection $40,000
Surgical site infection$13,000
Some of those costs have been offset in the past by higher reimbursements to hospitals for cases with complications. Well, that is also about to end. CMS has announced that it plans in 2008 to stopMedicare reimbursement for cases in which certain preventable complications have occurred . Almost all the above complications make the CMS list. Thus, the financial incentive to provide high quality care and enhance patient safety will increase dramatically. And you can expect private third party payors to follow CMS in this change in reimbursement. While we expect that the list will be refined before actual implementation, the message is clear: Medicare will no longer pay for preventable complications.
It behooves all facilities to ensure they have appropriate patient safety/quality improvement programs in place to minimize the risk of these complications.
CFOs have traditionally focused much more on the revenue side of the balance sheet than the cost avoidance side. Justifying patient safety initiatives to CFOs should no longer be difficult when you put together a spreadsheet with the above averages times the number of occurrences at your facility.
Update from out November 2007 Whats New in the Patient Safety World:
Cost of adverse events in intensive care units
Add to the above the costs of adverse events in ICUs. Kaushal et al published a study of the cost for adverse events in ICUs. The average cost per adverse event for patients in the MICU was $3961 and the attributable increase in LOS was 0.77 days. Corresponding numbers for patients in the CCU were $3857 and 1.08 days. The extrapolated annual cost for adverse events in these two 10-bed ICUs was nearly $1.5 million. Clearly, there is significant opportunity for costs savings in prevention of adverse events in this setting. Organizations looking for a good ROI (return on investment) in their patient safety programs may want to focus on ICUs.
Kaushal R, Bates DW, Franz C, Soukup JR, Rothschild JM. Cost of adverse events in intensive care units. Critical Care Med 2007; 35: 24792483
We pointed out in our May 15, 2007 Tip of the Week that important lessons from other industries can be applied in healthcare regarding patient safety. Accidents in the airline and transportation industries have many analogies to adverse incidents in healthcare. Another good example is the 1996 ValuJet fire and crash in the Everglades (NTSB report).
Basically, the fatal crash followed a fire in the cargo compartment that was triggered by unexpended chemical oxygen generator canisters. Such canisters were known to be capable of producing fires, both because they generate large amounts of heat and then supply oxygen capable of feeding the fire. Procedures called for not shipping such canisters unless they had locking caps or their contents had been completely expended.
The major issues had to do with the nature of the maintencance of planes and problems with communications. ValuJet was a relatively new airline that was expanding rapidly. One of its cost control strategies was to outsource some of its plane maintenance, a practice allowed by the FAA as long as the same policies and procedures were followed by the subcontractor that would apply to in-house maintenance. The airline outsourcing is also responsible for oversight and supervision of the subcontractors work. The company doing the outsourced maintenance, SabreTech, also had both its own full-time maintenance personnel and hired other temporary personnel. The latter did not receive the same inservice/training on various policies & procedures that the full-time personnel received. SabreTech also apparently did not have in stock the locking caps that were required to disable the canisters.
In addition to the financial pressures that led the airline and the maintenance organization to use subcontractors and temporary personnel, there was an additional pressure created by the contractual obligation of the subcontract to turn the airplane over in a specified time period or face a financial penalty. So some of the technicians were working extensive overtime in attempt to meet the time constraints.
They were also functioning in multi-operator teams, where work begun by one technician might be eventually completed by another technician. Hence, communication during handoffs was a problem. In some cases, the work cards were signed as though a step (the expending of the contents) was completed, assuming that someone else had or would complete that task. And color-coded labels that should have identified the canisters as hazardous were inappropriately used, resulting in personnel in shipping/receiving to be unaware they had materials that should not be placed aboard a plane. And in some cases the only communication that took place with the shipping/receiving personnel was via those labels. The latter eventually cleared the canisters to be loaded on the ill-fated airplane.
Additionally, the parent airline did have supervisory personnel assigned to the subcontractor but they worked only in the daytime whereas much of the maintenance activities were done at night.
Sound familiar? Most of these issues are faced by healthcare facilities on a regular basis. Financial pressures often lead to use of part-time or temporary personnel rather than full-time personnel. So one needs to be concerned about proper training/inservicing of those personnel and ensure that the communications during the resulting increased number of handoffs will be appropriately managed. In some cases, the savings achieved by use of part-time or temporary personnel may be short-sighted. Additionally, it is difficult for such temporary personnel to become part of a culture of safety one needs to develop in a healthcare facility. But if and when you do need to use temporary or part-time personnel, make sure that they have been appropriately trained for all the procedures in their area of work.
Teaching facilities also need to take this into account when housestaff are rotating from one hospital to another because they are similar to the temporary personnel in that regard.
The color tag issue is also an important one. In healthcare we often use color coding as a useful patient safety measure. Nevertheless, everyone needs to understand what the color coding means. When a facility uses a color code that is not an industry-wide accepted standard, the temporary personnel may not be familiar with it and may misinterpret its significance.
And the communications/handoffs/multi-operator team issues abound in healthcare facilities. And if you are auditing the quality of handoffs in some fashion, make sure you audit a sample of all handoffs, not just the daytime ones (particularly since more handoffs probably occur during the evening and night hours).
Once again, lessons learned from other industries may be extremely valuable in patient safety activities. Well have some other examples in future Tips of the Week.
In our August 7, 2007 Tip of the Week we mentioned the book by James Reason and Alan Hobbs Managing Maintenance Error. A Practical Guide has a particularly good discussion of violations (which are intentional deviations from standards) and the reasons for them and a useful approach that one company took to reduce them. Violations, of course, are not always bad and are often a sign that the underlying process or system was flawed in the first place. Violations and workarounds are very common in healthcare. In fact, we often reward people for their innovation in finding solutions to organizational barriers. However, the problem is that workarounds and other violations in the aggregate tend to promote errors and, just as importantly, a good workaround that solves a system problem needs to be uniformly applied wherever the flawed system is in effect rather than having multiple different workarounds ongoing in different parts of the organization.
The December 2005 Advisory from the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority has a goodarticle on workarounds. That article includes a list of over 70 at-risk behaviors compiled by ISMP relating to medication safety. Many of the at-risk behaviors involve workarounds and apply to multiple activities besides medication safety. The list is a good place to begin your look at potential error-producing behaviors that may be amenable to change.
We recommend that during Patient Safety Walk Rounds frontline staff be asked (in a non-threatening, non-punitive manner) what workarounds they see or do themselves. Then one needs to determine the underlying reason for the workaround and attempt to develop an optimal solution that may be applied system-wide.
A second approach is the one noted in the Reason & Hobbs book in which a Swedish company tried to modify the behavior of its drivers. They assembled their drivers in small groups with a facilitator. At the first meeting they discussed general safety and quality issues and assembled a list of issues. At a second meeting they broke the list into things they had to send to management to fix and things they thought they could fix themselves. At the third and final meeting they collectively discuss the issues they felt they could deal with themselves. At the end, they write down for themselves a reminder of what they will do individually to solve the issue. The group that participated in this activity had a 50% reduction in driving accidents compared to a control group that did not participate. Interestingly, most of the group participants did not feel that the group discussions had affected their behavior. However, it is hard to deny the results demonstrated.
We therefore recommend that groups with a natural affinity (eg. those working in an ICU, or dialysis unit, or radiology department) get together to do this sort of group exercise in which workarounds and other at-risk behaviors are discussed. Your frontline workers not only know most problems better than you do they also probably know better how to solve them!
PrintWorkarounds as a Safety Issue
Aroot cause analysis has been published on an unintentional chemotherapy overdose that gained the attention of the Canadian media a year ago. This is an extremely well done RCA that has numerous lessons learned and should be read by anyone involved in patient safety, whether your facility is involved in cancer chemotherapy or not.
The RCA was coordinated by the Institute for Safe Medication Practices Canada and utilized theCanadian Root Cause Analysis Framework developed by the Canadian Patient Safety Institute, ISMP Canada, and Saskatchewan Health. For those unfamiliar with that RCA framework, it is an excellent comprehensive overview of the elements of a thorough RCA. It incorporates most of the important elements of the more widely knownVeterans Administration root cause analysis tools and adds elements from a variety of other resources.
The case involved a 43 year old woman who was being treated for an advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma with a chemotherapy protocol of high-dose fluorouracil and cisplatinum. The chemotherapy was to be given intravenously by an infusion pump over a 4-day period. However, the pump was inadvertently programmed to infuse the entire contents over a 4-hour period instead. The patient died as a result of the mishap.
The RCA clearly developed a timeline and an understanding of what happened, then did a cause-and-effect analysis, resulting in three causal chains and multiple associated findings or incidental findings that are equally important in identifying opportunities to improve patient safety.
The discussion on the causal chains leading to incorrect programming of the infusion rate is excellent and focuses on many of the individual issues we have mentioned in previous Tips of the Week. The formula the bedside nurses had to use was incredibly complex and they did not have at hand all the information needed to make the calculation. The medication label not only had several features not in keeping with good human factors design principles but also included unnecessary information that may have increased the opportunity for false confirmation of the infusion rate. The double check process did not catch the programming error and there was a lack of feedback from the pump that further reduced the opportunity to notice the incorrect infusion rate. The description about how several advanced technologies were poorly integrated and actually led to increased cognitive workload is particularly informative.
All the above occurred against a background where the potential toxicity of the regimen and the lack of an effective treatment for overdose did not appear to be fully appreciated by numerous members of the healthcare team. Much had to do with the dearth of published literature on fluorouracil overdosage.
Many of the most useful comments pertain to the response to the incident. The recommendations expand upon some of the important points we included in our July 24, 2007 Tip of the Week on an incident response checklist. They also showed how multiple other individuals would have had similar difficulties programming the pump and nicely illustrated how a facility needs to assemble a representative group of end-users during the pre-purchase phase of any investment in new technology in order to identify potential usability and safety issues.
The recommendations made in the RCA are well thought out and do take into consideration possible unintended consequences. The recommendations extend well beyond the facility and include recommendations for manufacturers, regulators, safety organizations, etc. A followup to that RCA was also published in the August 20, 2007ISMP Canada Safety Bulletin .
This is an excellent RCA and a model for doing a good RCA. In fact, our sole criticism has to do with their prioritization of causal statements. The treatment protocol design was ranked #15 on their list. We would have ranked it at or near the top of the list. A high-reliability organization would assume that something could go wrong with the infusion process and ensure that, if it did go wrong, irreparable harm would not take place. We see this as akin to the concentrated potassium chloride issue. We understand that convenience of the patient must have been important in development of the chemotherapy protocol but inclusion of 4 days worth of fluorouracil (plus a single high dose of cisplatinum) in a single IV bag enabled the fatal outcome when subsequent errors occurred. A safety culture would likely have said what is the highest dose that a patient could tolerate in one day (or less) if there was inadvertent administration of the infusion?. A safety culture would have designed the protocol with sublethal dosages that would have protected the patient in the event of what can go wrong will go wrong. It also would not have put the healthcare workers at the sharp end in a situation none of us would want to be in.
All the people who contributed to this excellent RCA are to be congratulated. This is clearly the type of incident that could occur today at multiple healthcare facilities and provides numerous useful lessons you all can use. You need to read it because many of the same issues occur in processes your facility uses today. Its also a great teaching tool to use with your RCA Team or any multidisciplinary team involved in patient safety.
Addendum: TheSeptember 20, 2007 Medication Safety Alert from ISMP also includes a summary of this case.
In several of our Tips of the Week we have mentioned issues related to the use of colored-coded labels or identifiers to alert staff to a number of issues (high alert medications, flag catheters, flag orders, etc.). Visual cues are a time-honored way of communicating information of extreme importance. However, lack of standardization of colors and their meanings can lead to dangerous circumstances and produce undesired outcomes.
Anadvisory by the Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority in December 2005 was inspired by a near-miss incident in which a patient incorrectly had a yellow-colored wrist band placed that meant Do Not Rescuscitate. The nurse who placed the yellow wrist band usually worked in another facility where a yellow wristband meant restricted extremity. The advisory gave several other examples of incidents arising from color-coded wrist bands and also noted that wristbands are often temporarily removed for procedures or may be covered up by the patient or a caregiver and that some patients may come into a hospital wearing a colored wristband that has nothing to do with their health status (eg. social cause wristbands). The PSA then did a statewide survey and found that most facilities used color-coded wrist bands to indicate at least some condition or alert but that lack of standardization across facilities (for both the colors used and the conditions for which they are used) was a major problem. They made several recommendations:
They also recommended addressing the issue of wristbands that patients bring with them on admission, patient/family/staff education, policies and procedures, etc.
The issue of standardization remains the most significant barrier to use of color-coded wristbands as a patient safety tool. Several states and regions have done collaboratives to adopt standardized practices on this issue. The Missouri Center for Patient Safety recently put out an excellent toolkit"Banding Together - for patient safety" Standardization and Implementation Toolkit.
They adopted most of the recommendations from the Pennsylvania PSA and recommended only three colored wrist bands: red to denote allergies, yellow to denote high fall risk, and purple to denote DNR. They chose red for allergy because red signals Stop! in most industries and other environments. Yellow was chosen for fall prone patients since it denotes Caution!. Purple was chosen to denote that a patient has Do Not Rescuscitate status, largely because blue (currently used at many hospitals) might lead to confusion. Since Code Blue is used by many hospitals to summon the rescuscitation team, a blue wristband might confuse people as to whether blue means do I code or not code here?. They also recommend pre-printing text on the bands to help reinforce the color-coding system for new staff and to help avoid confusion in dim light or for color blind individuals.
They recommend removal of any social cause or other colored wristbands on admission (with appropriate education of patients and families of the reasons) and, if that is not possible, covering those wristbands with bandages or medical tape. And wristbands from other facilities should be removed.
The Missouri toolkit has excellent resources for implementation, including good tips about development of policy and procedure, a sample workplan, FAQs, staff education, patient/family education, community education, brochures, PowerPoint slides, and even references on makers and designs of wristbands.
We highly recommend use of color-coded wristbands for the above indications, but only when you can be reasonably sure that all healthcare workers who might be working in your facility fully understand their meaning and use. That usually means that there has been a regional or state-wide collaborative to standardize the colors and their meanings across healthcare sites. We see many such regional organizations looking for a good project to collaborate on. This is a good one and most of the leg work has already been done for you!
Addenda:
The Colorado Foundation for Medical Care also provides aWristband Color Standardization Project Implementation Toolkit. They add the color green to denote latex allergy and the color pink to denote restricted extremity. They also thoughtfully recommend that the color designation should apply not only to wristbands but any form of designation of the 5 conditions (eg. stickers or placards).
The Minnesota Hospital Association also has a Wristband Implementation Toolkit. It also adopts green to denote latex allergy and pink to denote restricted extremity. They also provide a Power Point presentation on the color-coded wristbands and a sample policy.
PrintWristbands: The Color-Coded Conundrum
A couple of weeks ago Buffalo Bills tight end Kevin Everett suffered a life-threatening spinal cord injury during a football game. Though his ultimate prognosis remains unknown, he has demonstrated some early neurological improvement that may be due at least in part to the rapid response of the emergency medical personnel and team physicians, including use of induced hypothermia which apparently had never been used this early in a human spinal cord injury. The ambulance/emergency medical technician team at the stadium had, in fact, met with team physicians Drs. John Marzo and Andrew Cappuccino a week before the first home gameto go over procedures to be followed in the event of a suspected spinal injury. That training included the possible use of induced hypothermia by intravenous infusion of cold saline. The ambulance was also specially equipped with a backboard designed to accommodate a player's helmet and pads. Atother NFL stadiums, physicians and emergency medical response teams simulated how they would respond to similar incidents.
Use of simulation in healthcare has become popular as a tool to help promote teamwork. Its roots are from Cockpit Resource Management training (also known as Crew Resource Management training) in the aviation industry (see our May 15, 2007 Tip of the Week). Its most often used for teams, such as operating room teams, to improve communication skills and decision-making capabilities. Some simulators involve expensive hardware and software that allows life-like clinical situations and allows for complications or unexpected circumstances to be programmed into the simulation scenarios.
But simulation does not have to use expensive laboratories and equipment. Simulation could and should be part of your FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) activities. OurSeptember 11, 2007 Tip of the Week discussed the RCA on an unintentional chemotherapy overdose. Some of the issues addressed in the RCA dealt with the response and management of the patient after the patient had received the high dose of chemotherapy much more rapidly than planned. We wonder how many organizations that utilize such chemotherapy protocols (or a variety of other protocols, for that matter) have ever simulated such an unintended incident. Most often in a FMEA, one might simply note that someone would have to look up the effects of the chemotherapy toxicity and the clinical management of the patient. But an actual simulation in the above case may have surprised people when the paucity of published information on fluorouracil overdosage was discovered. Findings from such a simulation could certainly lead to a refinement of the protocol.
So a good simulation activity should include not only what steps are expected to be taken under certain circumstances but also anticipate what things might go wrong and how you would respond under those additional circumstances. Actually acting out the situation can sometimes produce surprises that lead to constructive changes. Think about adding that step when you do your next FMEA activity.
Click on the "Contact Us" button at the left to send us your comments on our "Patient Safety Tip of the Week" cases.
To get "Patient Safety Tip of the Week "emailed to you, click here and enter "subscribe" in the subject field.
January 31, 2023
January 24, 2023
January 17, 2023
Patient Safety with NOAC’s and DOAC’s
January 10, 2023
January 3, 2023
Helping Inpatients Sleep – Failing Grades
December 27, 2022
Tip of the Week on Vacation
December 20, 2022
Amazing Results from I-PASS Implementation
December 13, 2022
Surgical Teams – the “Consistency Score”
December 6, 2022
Rare Risk – Defibrillator Fires
November 29, 2022
November 22, 2022
The Apple Watch and Patient Safety
November 15, 2022
November 8, 2022
November 1, 2022
APSF on Criminalization of Medical Error
October 25, 2022
October 18, 2022
Methotrexate Again, With a Twist
October 11, 2022
Good Intentions, Unintended Consequences
October 4, 2022
Successfully Reducing OR Traffic
September 27, 2022
September 20, 2022
September 13, 2022
Smart Socks and Robots for Fall Prevention?
September 6, 2022
AORN and Others on Retained Surgical Items
August 30, 2022
August 23, 2022
Yes, There is a Proper Way to Assess Orthostatic Hypotension
August 16, 2022
August 9, 2022
Tip of the Week on Vacation
August 2, 2022
Tip of the Week on Vacation
July 26, 2022
More Risks in the Radiology Suite
July 19, 2022
Sucked Out of the Plane at 17,000 Feet
July 12, 2022
Radiologists Racked by Interruptions
July 5, 2022
Tip of the Week on Vacation
June 28, 2022
Pneumonia in Nervous System Injuries
June 21, 2022
June 14, 2022
June 7, 2022
May 31, 2022
NHS Serious Incident Response Framework
May 24, 2022
Requiring Indication for Antibiotic Prescribing
May 17, 2022
Patient Harm in Medicare Inpatients
May 10, 2022
May 3, 2022
April 26, 2022
Challenges with Early Warning Systems
April 19, 2022
April 12, 2022
A Healthcare Worker’s Worst Fear
April 5, 2022
Follow-up on Incidental Findings
March 29, 2022
Disturbing Stats on Perioperative Benzodiazepine Use in Elderly Patients
March 22, 2022
Not Just Politicians That Behave Badly
March 15, 2022
Medication Errors in Home Care
March 8, 2022
Update on Retained Surgical Items
March 1, 2022
Including the Indication on Prescriptions
February 22, 2022
Medication Reconciliation at ICU Exit
February 15, 2022
February 8, 2022
ED to Inpatient Delays Increase Mortality
February 1, 2022
Perioperative Delirium is Not Just Postoperative
January 25, 2022
More on Dental Patient Safety Issues
January 18, 2022
January 11, 2022
Documenting Distractions in the OR
January 4, 2022
Spin or Not: A Useful Secondary Finding in a Study
December 28, 2021
Tip of the Week on Vacation
December 21, 2021
December 14, 2021
Delayed Hemorrhage After Head Trauma in Anticoagulated Patients
December 7, 2021
November 30, 2021
November 23, 2021
The Perils of Hypertonic Sodium Chloride
November 16, 2021
Cognitive Biases and Heuristics in the Delivery Room
November 9, 2021
November 2, 2021
Adverse Drug Events After Hospitalization
October 26, 2021
Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression Costly in Fiscal as Well as Human Terms
October 19, 2021
COVID-19 Vaccine/ Flu Vaccine Mixups
October 12, 2021
FDA Approval of Concussion Tool – Why Not a Fatigue Detection Tool?
October 5, 2021
September 28, 2021
Barcoding Better? Not So Fast!
September 21, 2021
Repeat CT in Anticoagulated Patients After Minor Head Trauma Not Cost-Effective
September 14, 2021
September 7, 2021
The Vanderbilt Tragedy Gets Uglier
August 31, 2021
The Community Pharmacy and Patient Safety
August 24, 2021
More Home Infusion Safety Issues
August 17, 2021
Tip of the Week on Vacation
August 10, 2021
Tip of the Week on Vacation
August 3, 2021
Obstetric Patients More At-Risk for Wrong Patient Orders
July 27, 2021
July 20, 2021
FDA Warning: Magnets in Consumer Electronics May Affect Medical Devices
July 13, 2021
The Skinny on Rapid Response Teams
July 6, 2021
Tip of the Week on Vacation
June 29, 2021
June 22, 2021
Remotely Monitoring Suicidal Patients in Non-Behavioral Health Areas
June 15, 2021
What’s Happened to Your Patient Safety Walk Rounds?
June 8, 2021
Cut OR Traffic to Cut Surgical Site Infections
June 1, 2021
Stronger Magnets, More MRI Safety Concerns
May 25, 2021
Yes, Radiologists Have Handoffs, Too
May 18, 2021
Medical Overuse Is Not Just An Economic Problem
May 11, 2021
How Are Alerts in Ambulatory CPOE Doing?
May 4, 2021
More 10x Dose Errors in Pediatrics
April 27, 2021
Errors Common During Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke
April 20, 2021
Taser “Slip and Capture Error” Again!
April 13, 2021
Incidental Findings – What’s Your Strategy?
April 6, 2021
March 30, 2021
Need for Better Antibiotic Stewardship
March 23, 2021
Nursing Staffing and Sepsis Outcomes
March 16, 2021
Sleep Program Successfully Reduces Delirium
March 9, 2021
Update: Disclosure and Apology: How to Do It
March 2, 2021
Barriers to Timely Catheter Removal
February 23, 2021
February 16, 2021
New Methods for QTc Monitoring
February 9, 2021
February 2, 2021
MGH Protocols Reduce Risk of Self-Harm in ED
January 26, 2021
This Freezer Accident May Cost Lives
January 19, 2021
Technology to Identify Fatigue?
January 12, 2021
January 5, 2021
Dilaudid/HYDROmorphone Still Problematic
December 29, 2019
Tip of the Week on Vacation
December 22, 2019
Tip of the Week on Vacation
December 15, 2020
Our Perennial Pre-Holiday Warning: “Be Careful Out There!”
December 8, 2020
Maternal Mortality: Looking in All the Wrong Places?
December 1, 2020
An Early Warning System and Response System That Work
November 24, 2020
November 17, 2020
A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words
November 10, 2020
November 3, 2020
Reminder: Infant Abduction Risk
October 27, 2020
Conflicting Studies on Technology to Reduce RSI’s
October 20, 2020
More on Post-operative Risks for Patients with OSA
October 13, 2020
October 6, 2020
Successfully Reducing Opioid-Related Adverse Events
September 29, 2020
September 22, 2020
VA RCA’s: Suicide Risks Vary by Site
September 15, 2020
September 8, 2020
Follow Up on Tests Pending at Discharge
September 1, 2020
NY State and Nurse Staffing Issues
August 25, 2020
The Off-Hours Effect in Radiology
August 18, 2020
August 11, 2020
Above-Door Alarms to Prevent Suicides
August 4, 2020
July 28, 2020
July 21, 2020
Is This Patient Allergic to Penicillin?
July 14, 2020
A Thesis on Intrahospital Transports
July 7, 2020
Another Patient Found Dead in a Stairwell
June 30, 2020
What Happens after Hospitalization?
June 23, 2020
June 16, 2020
June 9, 2020
Perioperative Medication Safety
June 2, 2020
May 26, 2020
May 19, 2020
Reminder on Telephone or Verbal Orders
May 12, 2020
May 5, 2020
COVID-19 and the Dental Office
April 28, 2020
April 21, 2020
Parenteral Nutrition Safety Issues
April 14, 2020
Patient Safety Tidbits for the COVID-19 Pandemic
April 7, 2020
From Preoperative Assessment to Preoperative Optimization
March 31, 2020
Intrahospital Transport Issues in Children
March 24, 2020
Mayo Clinic: How to Get Photos in Your EMR
March 17, 2020
March 10, 2020
Medication Harm in the Elderly
March 3, 2020
Opportunities to Reduce Unnecessary Contact Precautions
February 25, 2020
More on Perioperative Gabapentinoids
February 18, 2020
February 11, 2020
February 4, 2020
Drugs and Chronic Kidney Disease
January 28, 2020
January 21, 2020
Disruptive Behavior and Patient Safety: Cause or Effect?
January 14, 2020
January 7, 2020
Even More Concerns About MRI Safety
December 31, 2019
Tip of the Week on Vacation
December 14, 2019
Tip of the Week on Vacation
December 17, 2019
December 10, 2019
December 3, 2019
Overlapping Surgery Back in the News
November 26, 2019
Pennsylvania Law on Notifying Patients of Test Results
November 19, 2019
An Astonishing Gap in Medication Safety
November 12, 2019
Patient Photographs Again Help Radiologists
November 5, 2019
October 29, 2019
Tip of the Week on Vacation
October 22, 2019
Tip of the Week on Vacation
October 15, 2019
October 8, 2019
October 1, 2019
Electronic Medication Reconciliation: Glass Half Full or Half Empty?
September 24, 2019
EHR-related Malpractice Claims
September 17, 2019
American College of Surgeons Geriatric Surgery Verification Program
September 10, 2019
Joint Commission Naming Standard Leaves a Gap
September 3, 2019
Lessons from an Inpatient Suicide
August 27, 2019
August 20, 2019
Yet Another (Not So) Unusual RSI
August 13, 2019
Betsy Lehman Center Report on Medical Error
August 6, 2019
July 30, 2019
Lessons from Hospital Suicide Attempts
July 23, 2019
Order Sets Can Nudge the Right Way or the Wrong Way
July 16, 2019
July 9, 2019
Spinal Injection of Tranexamic Acid
July 2, 2019
Tip of the Week on Vacation
June 25, 2019
June 18, 2019
June 11, 2019
ISMP’s Grissinger on Overreliance on Technology
June 4, 2019
Medication Errors in the OR – Part 3
May 28, 2019
May 21, 2019
Mixed Message on Number of Open EMR Records
May 14, 2019
Wrong-Site Surgery and Difficult-to-Mark Sites
May 7, 2019
Simulation Training for OR Fires
April 30, 2019
Reducing Unnecessary Urine Cultures
April 23, 2019
In and Out the Door and Other OR Flow Disruptions
April 16, 2019
AACN Practice Alert on Alarm Management
April 9, 2019
Handoffs for Every Occasion
April 2, 2019
Unexpected Events During MRI
March 26, 2019
March 19, 2019
March 12, 2019
Update on Overlapping Surgery
March 5, 2019
Infusion Pump Problems
February 26, 2019
Vascular Access Device Dislodgements
February 19, 2019
Focus on Pediatric Patient Safety
February 12, 2019
From Tragedy to Travesty of Justice
February 12, 2019
2 ER Drug Studies: Reassurances and Reservations
February 5, 2019
Flaws in Our Medication Safety Technologies
January 29, 2018
National Patient Safety Goal for Suicide Prevention
January 22, 2019
Wandering Patients
January 15, 2019
Another Plus for Prehabilitation
January 8, 2019
Maternal Mortality in the Spotlight
January 1, 2019
More on Automated Dispensing Cabinet (ADC) Safety
December 25, 2018
Happy Holidays!
December 18, 2018
Great Recommendations for e-Prescribing
December 11, 2018
December 4, 2018
Don’t Use Syringes for Topical Products
November 27, 2018
November 20, 2018
November 13, 2018
Antipsychotics Fail in ICU Delirium
November 6, 2018
More on Promoting Sleep in Inpatients
October 30, 2018
October 23, 2018
Lessons From Yet Another Aviation Incident
October 16, 2018
October 9, 2018
October 2, 2018
Speaking Up About Disruptive Behavior
September 25, 2018
Foley Follies
September 18, 2018
September 11, 2018
September 4, 2018
The 12-Hour Nursing Shift: Another Nail in the Coffin
August 28, 2018
Thought You Discontinued That Medication? Think Again
August 21, 2018
Delayed CT Scan in the Anticoagulated Patient
August 14, 2018
ISMP Canada’s Updated “Do Not Use” Abbreviation List
August 7, 2018
Tip of the Week on Vacation
July 31, 2018
Surgery and the Opioid-Tolerant Patient
July 24, 2018
More on Speech Recognition Software Errors
July 17, 2018
OSA Screening in Stroke Patients
July 10, 2018
Another Jump from a Hospital Window
July 3, 2018
Tip of the Week on Vacation
June 26, 2018
Infection Related to Colonoscopy
June 19, 2018
June 12, 2018
Adverse Events in Cancer Patients
June 5, 2018
Pennsylvania Patient Safety Authority on Iatrogenic Burns
May 29, 2018
More on Nursing Workload and Patient Safety
May 22, 2018
Hazardous Intrahospital Transport
May 15, 2018
May 8, 2018
May 1, 2018
April 24, 2018
April 17, 2018
More on Tests Pending at Discharge
April 10, 2018
Prepping the Geriatric Patient for Surgery
April 3, 2018
March 27, 2018
March 20, 2018
Minnesota Highlights Lost Tissue Samples
March 13, 2018
March 6, 2018
February 27, 2018
Update on Patient Safety Walk Rounds
February 20, 2018
February 13, 2018
February 6, 2018
Adverse Events in Inpatient Psychiatry
January 30, 2018
January 23, 2018
Unintentional Hypothermia Back in Focus
January 16, 2018
January 9, 2018
More on Fire Risk from Surgical Preps
January 2, 2018
Preventing Perioperative Nerve Injuries
December 26, 2017
Tip of the Week on Vacation
December 19, 2017
December 12, 2017
Joint Commission on Suicide Prevention
December 5, 2017
Massachusetts Initiative on Cataract Surgery
November 28, 2017
More on Dental Sedation/Anesthesia Safety
November 21, 2017
OSA, Oxygen, and Alarm Fatigue
November 14, 2017
Tracking C. diff to a CT Scanner
November 7, 2017
Perioperative Neuropathies
October 31, 2017
Target Drugs for Deprescribing
October 24, 2017
Neurosurgery and Time of Day
October 17, 2017
Progress on Alarm Management
October 10, 2017
More on Torsade de Pointes
October 3, 2017
Respiratory Compromise: One Size Does Not Fit All
September 26, 2017
Tip of the Week on Vacation
September 19, 2017
Tip of the Week on Vacation
September 12, 2017
Can You Hear Me Now?
September 5, 2017
Another Iatrogenic Burn
August 29, 2017
Suicide in the Bathroom
August 22, 2017
August 15, 2017
Delayed Emergency Surgery and Mortality Risk
August 8, 2017
Sedation for Pediatric MRI Rising
August 1, 2017
Progress on Wrong Patient Orders
July 25, 2017
Can We Influence the “Weekend Effect”?
July 18, 2017
Another Hazard from Alcohol-Based Hand Gels
July 11, 2017
The 12-Hour Shift Takes More Hits
July 4, 2017
Tip of the Week on Vacation
June 27, 2017
June 20, 2017
June 13, 2017
June 6, 2017
NYS Mandate for Sepsis Protocol Works
May 30, 2017
Errors in Pre-Populated Medication Lists
May 23, 2017
May 16, 2017
Are Surgeons Finally Ready to Screen for Frailty?
May 9, 2017
Missed Nursing Care and Mortality Risk
May 2, 2017
Anatomy of a Wrong Procedure
April 25, 2017
April 18, 2017
Alarm Response and Nurse Shift Duration
April 11, 2017
Interruptions: The Ones We Forget About
April 4, 2017
Deprescribing in Long-Term Care
March 28, 2017
More Issues with Dental Sedation/Anesthesia
March 21, 2017
Success at Preventing Delirium
March 14, 2017
More on Falls on Inpatient Psychiatry
March 7, 2017
February 28, 2017
February 21, 2017
Yet More Jumps from Hospital Windows
February 14, 2017
February 7, 2017
January 31, 2017
More Issues in Pediatric Safety
January 24, 2017
Dexmedetomidine to Prevent Postoperative Delirium
January 17, 2017
January 10, 2017
The 26-ml Applicator Strikes Again!
January 3, 2017
What’s Happening to “I’m Sorry”?
December 27, 2016
Tip of the Week on Vacation
December 20, 2016
End-of-Rotation Transitions and Mortality
December 13, 2016
More on Double-Booked Surgery
December 6, 2016
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
November 29, 2016
Doubling Down on Double-Booked Surgery
November 22, 2016
Leapfrog, Picklists, and Healthcare IT Vulnerabilities
November 15, 2016
November 8, 2016
Managing Distractions and Interruptions
November 1, 2016
CMS Emergency Preparedness Rule
October 25, 2016
Desmopressin Back in the Spotlight
October 18, 2016
Yet More Questions on Contact Precautions
October 11, 2016
New Guideline on Preop Screening and Assessment for OSA
October 4, 2016
September 27, 2016
September 20, 2016
Downloadable ABCDEF Bundle Toolkits for Delirium
September 13, 2016
Vanderbilt’s Electronic Procedural Timeout
September 6, 2016
August 30, 2016
Can You Really Limit Interruptions?
August 23, 2016
ISMP Canada: Automation Bias and Automation Complacency
August 16, 2016
How Is Your Alarm Management Initiative Going?
August 9, 2016
August 2, 2016
Drugs in the Elderly: The Goldilocks Story
July 26, 2016
Confirmed: Keep Your OR Doors Closed
July 19, 2016
Infants and Wrong Site Surgery
July 12, 2016
Forget Brexit – Brits Bash the RCA!
July 5, 2016
Tip of the Week on Vacation
June 28, 2016
Culture of Safety and Catheter-Associated Infections
June 21, 2016
Methotrexate Errors in Australia
June 14, 2016
Nursing Monitoring of Patients on Opioids
June 7, 2016
CPAP for Hospitalized Patients at High Risk for OSA
May 31, 2016
More Frailty Measures That Predict Surgical Outcomes
May 24, 2016
Texting Orders – Is It Really Safe?
May 17, 2016
Patient Safety Issues in Cataract Surgery
May 10, 2016
Medical Problems in Behavioral Health
May 3, 2016
Clinical Decision Support Malfunction
April 26, 2016
Lots More on Preventing Readmissions But Where's the Beef?
April 19, 2016
Independent Double Checks and Oral Chemotherapy
April 12, 2016
April 5, 2016
Workarounds Overriding Safety
March 29, 2016
March 22, 2016
Radiology Communication Errors May Surprise You
March 15, 2016
March 8, 2016
Tip of the Week on Vacation
March 1, 2016
February 23, 2016
February 16, 2016
February 9, 2016
February 2, 2016
January 26, 2016
More on Frailty and Surgical Morbidity and Mortality
January 19, 2016
Patient Identification in the Spotlight
January 12, 2016
New Resources on Improving Safety of Healthcare IT
January 5, 2016
Lessons from AirAsia Flight QZ8501 Crash
December 29, 2015
More Medical Helicopter Hazards
December 22, 2015
The Alberta Abbreviation Safety Toolkit
December 15, 2015
Vital Sign Monitoring at Night
December 8, 2015
Danger of Inaccurate Weights in Stroke Care
December 1, 2015
TALLman Lettering: Does It Work?
November 24, 2015
Door Opening and Foot Traffic in the OR
November 17, 2015
Patient Perspectives on Communication of Test Results
November 10, 2015
Weighing in on Double-Booked Surgery
November 3, 2015
Medication Errors in the OR - Part 2
October 27, 2015
Sentinel Event Alert on Falls and View from Across the Pond
October 20, 2015
Updated Beers List
October 13, 2015
Dilaudid Dangers #3
October 6, 2015
Suicide and Other Violent Inpatient Deaths
September 29, 2015
More on the 12-Hour Nursing Shift
September 22, 2015
The Cost of Being Rude
September 15, 2015
Another Possible Good Use of a Checklist
September 8, 2015
TREWScore for Early Recognition of Sepsis
September 1, 2015
August 25, 2015
Checklist for Intrahospital Transport
August 18, 2015
Missing Obstructive Sleep Apnea
August 11, 2015
New Oxygen Guidelines: Thoracic Society of Australia and NZ
August 4, 2015
Tip of the Week on Vacation
July 28, 2015
July 21, 2015
Avoiding Distractions in the OR
July 14, 2015
July 7, 2015
June 30, 2015
What Are Appropriate Indications for Urinary Catheters?
June 23, 2015
Again! Mistaking Antiseptic Solution for Radiographic Contrast
June 16, 2015
June 9, 2015
Add This to Your Fall Risk Assessment
June 2, 2015
May 26, 2015
May 19, 2015
May 12, 2015
More on Delays for In-Hospital Stroke
May 5, 2015
Errors with Oral Oncology Drugs
April 28, 2015
April 21, 2015
April 14, 2015
Using Insulin Safely in the Hospital
April 7, 2015
March 31, 2015
Clinical Decision Support for Pneumonia
March 24, 2015
Specimen Issues in Prostate Cancer
March 17, 2015
March 10, 2015
FDA Warning Label on Insulin Pens: Is It Enough?
March 3, 2015
Factors Related to Postoperative Respiratory Depression
February 24, 2015
More Risks with Long-Acting Opioids
February 17, 2015
Functional Impairment and Hospital Readmission, Surgical Outcomes
February 10, 2015
The Anticholinergic Burden and Dementia
February 3, 2015
CMS Hopes to Reduce Antipsychotics in Dementia
January 27, 2015
The Golden Hour for Stroke Thrombolysis
January 20, 2015
He Didn’t Wash His Hands After What!
January 13, 2015
January 6, 2015
Yet Another Handoff: The Intraoperative Handoff
December 30, 2014
Data Accumulates on Impact of Long Surgical Duration
December 23, 2014
Iatrogenic Burns in the News Again
December 16, 2014
More on Each Element of the Surgical Fire Triad
December 9, 2014
December 2, 2014
ANA Position Statement on Nurse Fatigue
November 25, 2014
Misdiagnosis Due to Lab Error
November 18, 2014
Handwashing Fades at End of Shift, ?Smartwatch to the Rescue
November 11, 2014
Early Detection of Clinical Deterioration
November 4, 2014
Progress on Fall Prevention
October 28, 2014
RF Systems for Retained Surgical Items
October 21, 2014
The Fire Department and Your Hospital
October 14, 2014
October 7, 2014
Our Take on Patient Safety Walk Rounds
September 30, 2014
More on Deprescribing
September 23, 2014
Stroke Thrombolysis: Need to Focus on Imaging-to-Needle Time
September 16, 2014
Focus on Home Care
September 9, 2014
The Handback
September 2, 2014
Frailty and the Trauma Patient
August 26, 2014
Surgeons’ Perception of Intraoperative Time
August 19, 2014
Some More Lessons Learned on Retained Surgical Items
August 12, 2014
Surgical Fires Back in the News
August 5, 2014
Tip of the Week on Vacation
July 29, 2014
The 12-Hour Nursing Shift: Debate Continues
July 22, 2014
More on Operating Room Briefings and Debriefings
July 15, 2014
Barriers to Success of Early Warning Systems
July 8, 2014
Update: Minor Head Trauma in the Anticoagulated Patient
July 1, 2014
Interruptions and Radiologists
June 24, 2014
Lessons from the General Motors Recall Analysis
June 17, 2014
SO2S Confirms Routine Oxygen of No Benefit in Stroke
June 10, 2014
Another Clinical Decision Support Tool to Avoid Torsade de Pointes
June 3, 2014
More on the Risk of Sedative/Hypnotics
May 27, 2014
A Gap in ePrescribing: Stopping Medications
May 20, 2014
May 13, 2014
Perioperative Sleep Apnea: Human and Financial Impact
May 6, 2014
Monitoring for Opioid-induced Sedation and Respiratory Depression
April 29, 2014
More on the Unintended Consequences of Contact Isolation
April 22, 2014
Impact of Resident Workhour Restrictions
April 15, 2014
Specimen Identification Mixups
April 8, 2014
FMEA to Avoid Breastmilk Mixups
April 1, 2014
Expensive Aspects of Sepsis Protocol Debunked
March 25, 2014
March 18, 2014
Systems Approach Improving Stroke Care
March 11, 2014
We Miss the Graphic Flowchart!
March 4, 2014
Evidence-Based Prescribing and Deprescribing in the Elderly
February 25, 2014
Joint Commission Revised Diagnostic Imaging Requirements
February 18, 2014
February 11, 2014
Another Perioperative Handoff Tool: SWITCH
February 4, 2014
But What If the Battery Runs Low?
January 28, 2014
Is Polypharmacy Always Bad?
January 21, 2014
January 14, 2014
Diagnostic Error: Salient Distracting Features
January 7, 2014
Lessons From the Asiana Flight 214 Crash
December 24-31, 2013
Tip of the Week on Vacation
December 17, 2013
December 10, 2013
Better Handoffs, Better Results
December 3, 2013
Reducing Harm from Falls on Inpatient Psychiatry
November 26, 2013
Missed Care: New Opportunities?
November 19, 2013
Can We Improve Dilaudid/HYDROmorphone Safety?
November 12, 2013
More on Inappropriate Meds in the Elderly
November 5, 2013
Joint Commission Sentinel Event Alert: Unintended Retained Foreign Objects
October 29, 2013
PAD: The Pain, Agitation, and Delirium Care Bundle
October 22, 2013
How Safe Is Your Radiology Suite?
October 15, 2013
October 8, 2013
October 1, 2013
Fuels and Oxygen in OR Fires
September 24, 2013
Perioperative Use of CPAP in OSA
September 17, 2013
September 10, 2013
Informed Consent and Wrong-Site Surgery
September 3, 2013
Predicting Perioperative Complications: Slow and Simple
August 27 2013
Lessons on Wrong-Site Surgery
August 20 2013
Lessons from Canadian Analysis of Medical Air Transport Cases
August 13 2013
August 6, 2013
July 9-30, 2013
Tip of the Week on Vacation
July 2, 2013
June 25, 2013
June 18, 2013
DVT Prevention in Stoke – CLOTS 3
June 11, 2013
June 4, 2013
May 28, 2013
The Neglected Medications: IV Fluids
May 21, 2013
May 14, 2013
Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (Ogilvie’s Syndrome)
May 7, 2013
April 30, 2013
Photographic Identification to Prevent Errors
April 23, 2013
Plethora of Medication Safety Studies
April 16, 2013
April 9, 2013
Mayo Clinic System Alerts for QT Interval Prolongation
April 2, 2013
Absconding from Behavioral Health Services
March 26, 2013
Failure to Recognize Sleep Apnea Before Surgery
March 19, 2013
Dealing with the Violent Patient in the Emergency Department
March 12, 2013
More on Communicating Test Results
March 5, 2013
Underutilized Safety Tools: The Observational Audit
February 26, 2013
Insulin Pen Re-Use Incidents: How Do You Monitor Alerts?
February 19, 2013
Practical Postoperative Pain Management
February 12, 2013
CDPH: Lessons Learned from PCA Incident
February 5, 2013
Antidepressants and QT Interval Prolongation
January 29, 2013
A Flurry of Activity on Handoffs
January 22, 2013
You Don’t Know What You Don’t Know
January 15, 2013
January 8, 2013
More Lessons Learned on Retained Surgical Items
January 1, 2013
Don’t Throw Away Those View Boxes Yet
December 25, 2012
Tip of the Week on Vacation
December 18, 2012
Unintended Consequences of the CAUTI Measure?
December 11, 2012
December 4, 2012
Unintentional Perioperative Hypothermia: A New Twist
November 27, 2012
November 20, 2012
Update on Perioperative Management of Obstructive Sleep Apnea
November 13, 2012
The 12-Hour Nursing Shift: More Downsides
November 6, 2012
Using LEAN to Improve Stroke Care
October 30, 2012
October 23, 2012
Latent Factors Lurking in the OR
October 16, 2012
What is the Evidence on Double Checks?
October 9, 2012
Call for Focus on Diagnostic Errors
October 2, 2012
Test Results: Everyone’s Worst Nightmare
September 25, 2012
Preoperative Assessment for Geriatric Patients
September 18, 2012
September 11, 2012
In Search of the Ideal Early Warning Score
September 4, 2012
August 28, 2012
New Care Model Copes with Interruptions Better
August 21, 2012
More on Missed Followup of Tests in Hospital
August 14, 2012
August 7, 2012
Cognition, Post-Op Delirium, and Post-Op Outcomes
July 31, 2012
Surgical Case Duration and Miscommunications
July 24, 2012
FDA and Extended-Release/Long-Acting Opioids
July 17, 2012
July 10, 2012
Tip of the Week on Vacation
July 3, 2012
Recycling an Old Column: Dilaudid Dangers
June 26, 2012
Using Patient Photos to Reduce CPOE Errors
June 19, 2012
More Problems with Faxed Orders
June 12, 2012
Lessons Learned from the CDPH: Retained Foreign Bodies
June 5, 2012
Minor Head Trauma in the Anticoagulated Patient
May 29, 2012
Falls, Fractures, and Fatalities
May 22, 2012
Update on Preoperative Screening for Sleep Apnea
May 15, 2012
May 8, 2012
Importance of Nontechnical Skills in Healthcare
May 1, 2012
April 24, 2012
Fire Hazard of Skin Preps Oxygen
April 17, 2012
April 10, 2012
April 3, 2012
New Risk for Postoperative Delirium: Obstructive Sleep Apnea
March 27, 2012
March 20, 2012
Adverse Events Related to Psychotropic Medications
March 13, 2012
Medical Emergency Team Calls to Radiology
March 6, 2012
February 28, 2012
AACN Practice Alert on Delirium in Critical Care
February 21, 2012
Improving PCA Safety with Capnography
February 14, 2012
Handoffs More Than Battle of the Mnemonics
February 7, 2012
Another Neuromuscular Blocking Agent Incident
January 31, 2012
January 24, 2012
Patient Safety in Ambulatory Care
January 17, 2012
Delirium and Contact Isolation
January 10, 2012
January 3, 2012
Unintended Consequences of Restricted Housestaff Hours
December 20, 2011
December 13, 2011
December 6, 2011
Why You Need to Beware of Oxygen Therapy
November 29, 2011
November 22, 2011
Perioperative Management of Sleep Apnea Disappointing
November 15, 2011
November 8, 2011
WHOs Multi-professional Patient Safety Curriculum Guide
November 1, 2011
So Whats the Big Deal About Inserting an NG Tube?
October 25, 2011
October 18, 2011
October 11, 2011
October 4, 2011
Radiology Report Errors and Speech Recognition Software
September 27, 2011
The Canadian Suicide Risk Assessment Guide
September 20, 2011
When Practice Changes the Evidence: The CKD Story
September 13, 2011
Do You Use Fentanyl Transdermal Patches Safely?
September 6, 2011
August 30, 2011
Unintentional Discontinuation of Medications After Hospitalization
August 23, 2011
Catheter Misconnections Back in the News
August 16, 2011
August 9, 2011
Frailty and the Surgical Patient
August 2, 2011
July 26, 2011
July 19, 2011
Communication Across Professions
July 12, 2011
Psst! Pass it onHow a kids game can mold good handoffs
July 5, 2011
Sidney Dekker: Patient Safety. A Human Factors Approach
June 28, 2011
Long-Acting and Extended-Release Opioid Dangers
June 21, 2011
June 14, 2011
June 6, 2011
May 31, 2011
Book Review Human Factors and Team Psychology in a High Stakes Environment
May 24, 2011
May 17, 2011
Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression Again!
May 10, 2011
Preventing Preventable Readmissions: Not As Easy As It Sounds
May 3, 2011
April 26, 2011
Sleeping Air Traffic Controllers: What About Healthcare?
April 19, 2011
DVT Prophylaxis in Acute Stroke: Controversy Reappears
April 12, 2011
Medication Issues in the Ambulatory Setting
April 5, 2011
March 29, 2011
The Silent Treatment:A Dose of Reality
March 22, 2011
An EMR Feature Detrimental to Teamwork and Patient Safety
March 15, 2011
March 8, 2011
Yes, Physicians Get Interrupted Too!
March 1, 2011
February 22, 2011
February 15, 2011
Controversies in VTE Prophylaxis
February 8, 2011
February 1, 2011
January 25, 2011
Procedural Sedation in Children
January 18, 2011
More on Medication Errors in Long-Term Care
January 11, 2011
NPSA (UK) How to Guide: Five Steps to Safer Surgery
January 4, 2011
December 28, 2010
HAIs: Looking In All The Wrong Places
December 21, 2010
More Bad News About Off-Hours Care
December 14, 2010
NPSA (UK): Preventing Fatalities from Medication Loading Doses
December 6, 2010
More Tips to Prevent Wrong-Site Surgery
November 30, 2010
SURPASS: The Mother of All Checklists
November 23, 2010
Focus on Cumulative Radiation Exposure
November 16, 2010
November 9, 2010
12-Hour Nursing Shifts and Patient Safety
November 2, 2010
Insulin: Truly a High-Risk Medication
October 26, 2010
Confirming Medications During Anesthesia
October 19, 2010
Optimizing Medications in the Elderly
October 12, 2010
October 5, 2010
September 28, 2010
September 21, 2010
September 14, 2010
Wrong-Site Craniotomy: Lessons Learned
September 7, 2010
Patient Safety in Ob/Gyn Settings
August 31, 2010
August 24, 2010
The BP Oil Spill Analogies in Healthcare
August 17, 2010
Preoperative Consultation Time to Change
August 10, 2010
Its Not Always About The Evidence
August 3, 2010
Tip of the Week on Vacation
July 27, 2010
EMRs Still Have A Long Way To Go
July 20, 2010
More on the Weekend Effect/After-Hours Effect
July 13, 2010
Postoperative Opioid-Induced Respiratory Depression
July 6, 2010
Book Reviews: Pronovost and Gawande
June 29, 2010
Torsade de Pointes: Are Your Patients At Risk?
June 22, 2010
Disclosure and Apology: How to Do It
June 15, 2010
Dysphagia in the Stroke Patient: the Scottish Guideline
June 8, 2010
Surgical Safety Checklist for Cataract Surgery
June 1, 2010
May 25, 2010
May 18, 2010
Real-Time Random Safety Audits
May 11, 2010
May 4, 2010
More on the Impact of Interruptions
April 27, 2010
April 20, 2010
HITs Limited Impact on Quality To Date
April 13, 2010
April 6, 2010
March 30, 2010
Publicly Released RCAs: Everyone Learns from Them
March 23, 2010
ISMPs Guidelines for Standard Order Sets
March 16, 2010
A Patient Safety Scavenger Hunt
March 9, 2010
Communication of Urgent or Unexpected Radiology Findings
March 2, 2010
Alarm Sensitivity: Early Detection vs. Alarm Fatigue
February 23, 2010
Alarm Issues in the News Again
February 16, 2010
Spin/HypeKnowing It When You See It
February 9, 2010
More on Preventing Inpatient Suicides
February 2, 2010
January 26, 2010
Preventing Postoperative Delirium
January 19, 2010
January 12, 2010
Patient Photos in Patient Safety
January 5, 2010
December 29, 2009
Recognizing Deteriorating Patients
December 22, 2009
December 15, 2009
December 8, 2009
December 1, 2009
Patient Safety Doesnt End at Discharge
November 24, 2009
Another Rough Month for Healthcare IT
November 17, 2009
November 10, 2009
Conserving ResourcesBut Maintaining Patient Safety
November 3, 2009
Medication Safety: Frontline to the Rescue Again!
October 27, 2009
Co-Managing Patients: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly
October 20, 2009
Radiology AgainBut This Time Its Really Radiology!
October 13, 2009
October 6, 2009
Oxygen Safety: More Lessons from the UK
September 29, 2009
Perioperative Peripheral Nerve Injuries
September 22, 2009
Psychotropic Drugs and Falls in the SNF
September 15, 2009
ETTOs: Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Offs
September 8, 2009
Barriers to Medication Reconciliation
September 1, 2009
The Real Root Causes of Medical Helicopter Crashes
August 25, 2009
Interruptions, Distractions, InattentionOops!
August 18, 2009
Obstructive Sleep Apnea in the Perioperative Period
August 11, 2009
August 4, 2009
July 28, 2009
Wandering, Elopements, and Missing Patients
July 21, 2009
Medication Errors in Long Term-Care
July 14, 2009
Is Your Do Not Use Abbreviations List Adequate?
July 7, 2009
Nudge: Small Changes, Big Impacts
June 30, 2009
iSoBAR: Australian Clinical Handoffs/Handovers
June 23, 2009
June 16, 2009
Disclosing Errors That Affect Multiple Patients
June 9, 2009
CDC Update to the Guideline for Prevention of CAUTI
June 2, 2009
Why Hospitals Should FlyJohn Nance Nails It!
May 26, 2009
Learning from Tragedies. Part II
May 19, 2009
May 12, 2009
May 5, 2009
Adverse Drug Events in the ICU
April 28, 2009
Ticket Home and Other Tools to Facilitate Discharge
April 21, 2009
April 14, 2009
More on Rehospitalization After Discharge
April 7, 2009
March 31, 2009
Screening Patients for Risk of Delirium
March 24, 2009
March 17, 2009
March 10, 2009
Prolonged Surgical Duration and Time Awareness
March 3, 2009
Overriding AlertsLike Surfin the Web
February 24, 2009
Discharge Planning: Finally Something That Works!
February 17, 2009
Reducing Risk of Overdose with Midazolam Injection
February 10, 2009
Sedation in the ICU: The Dexmedetomidine Study
February 3, 2009
NTSB Medical Helicopter Crash Reports: Missing the Big Picture
January 27, 2009
Oxygen Therapy: Everything You Wanted to Know and More!
January 20, 2009
The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist Delivers the Outcomes
January 13, 2009
January 6, 2009
December 30, 2008
Unintended Consequences: Is Medication Reconciliation Next?
December 23, 2008
December 16, 2008
Joint Commission Sentinel Event Alert on Hazards of Healthcare IT
December 9, 2008
December 2, 2008
Playing without the ballthe art of communication in healthcare
November 25, 2008
November 18, 2008
Ticket to Ride: Checklist, Form, or Decision Scorecard?
November 11, 2008
November 4, 2008
October 28, 2008
More on Computerized Trigger Tools
October 21, 2008
October 14, 2008
October 7, 2008
Lessons from Falls....from Rehab Medicine
September 30, 2008
September 23, 2008
Checklists and Wrong Site Surgery
September 16, 2008
More on Radiology as a High Risk Area
September 9, 2008
Less is More.and Do You Really Need that Decimal?
September 2, 2008
August 26, 2008
August 19, 2008
August 12, 2008
Jerome Groopmans How Doctors Think
August 5, 2008
July 29, 2008
Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia
July 22, 2008
Lots New in the Anticoagulation Literature
July 15, 2008
July 8, 2008
July 1, 2008
WHOs New Surgical Safety Checklist
June 24, 2008
Urinary Catheter-Related UTIs: Bladder Bundles
June 17, 2008
Technology Workarounds Defeat Safety Intent
June 10, 2008
Monitoring the Postoperative COPD Patient
June 3, 2008
UK Advisory on Chest Tube Insertion
May27, 2008
If You Do RCAs or Design Healthcare ProcessesRead Gary Kleins Work
May20, 2008
CPOE Unintended Consequences Are Wrong Patient Errors More Common?
May13, 2008
Medication Reconciliation: Topical and Compounded Medications
May 6, 2008
Preoperative Screening for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
April 29, 2008
ASA Practice Advisory on Operating Room Fires
April 22, 2008
CMS Expanding List of No-Pay Hospital-Acquired Conditions
April 15, 2008
April 8, 2008
April 1, 2008
Pennsylvania PSAs FMEA on Telemetry Alarm Interventions
March 25, 2008
March 18, 2008
Is Desmopressin on Your List of Hi-Alert Medications?
March 11, 2008
March 4, 2008
Housestaff Awareness of Risks for Hazards of Hospitalization
February 26, 2008
Nightmares.The Hospital at Night
February 19, 2008
February 12, 2008
February 5, 2008
Reducing Errors in Obstetrical Care
January 29, 2008
Thoughts on the Recent Neonatal Nursery Fire
January 22, 2008
More on the Cost of Complications
January 15, 2008
Managing Dangerous Medications in the Elderly
January 8, 2008
Urinary Catheter-Associated Infections
January 1, 2008
December 25, 2007
December 18, 2007
December 11, 2007
CommunicationCommunicationCommunication
December 4, 2007
November 27,2007
November 20, 2007
New Evidence Questions Perioperative Beta Blocker Use
November 13, 2007
AHRQ's Free Patient Safety Tools DVD
November 6, 2007
October 30, 2007
Using IHIs Global Trigger Tool
October 23, 2007
Medication Reconciliation Tools
October 16, 2007
Radiology as a Site at High-Risk for Medication Errors
October 9, 2007
October 2, 2007
Taking Off From the Wrong Runway
September 25, 2007
Lessons from the National Football League
September 18, 2007
Wristbands: The Color-Coded Conundrum
September 11, 2007
Root Cause Analysis of Chemotherapy Overdose
September 4, 2007
August 28, 2007
Lessons Learned from Transportation Accidents
August 21, 2007
Costly Complications About To Become Costlier
August 14, 2007
More Medication-Related Issues in Ambulatory Surgery
August 7, 2007
Role of Maintenance in Incidents
July 31, 2007
Dangers of Neuromuscular Blocking Agents
July 24, 2007
Serious Incident Response Checklist
July 17, 2007
Falls in Patients on Coumadin or Other Anticoagulants
July 10, 2007
Catheter Connection Errors/Wrong Route Errors
July 3, 2007
June 26, 2007
Pneumonia in the Stroke Patient
June 19, 2007
Unintended Consequences of Technological Solutions
June 12, 2007
Medication-Related Issues in Ambulatory Surgery
June 5, 2007
Patient Safety in Ambulatory Surgery
May 29, 2007
Read Anything & Everything Written by Malcolm Gladwell!
May 22, 2007
May 15, 2007
Communication, Hearback and Other Lessons from Aviation
May 8, 2007
Doctor, when do I get this red rubber hose removed?
May 1, 2007
April 23, 2007
April 16, 2007
April 9, 2007
Make Your Surgical Timeouts More Useful
April 2, 2007
March 26, 2007
Alarms Should Point to the Problem
March 19, 2007
Put that machine back the way you found it!
March 12, 2007
March 5, 2007
February 26, 2007
Copyright 2012 The Truax Group Healthcare Consulting Patient Safety Solutions Tools Tips & Resources. All rights reserved.
PO Box 1230
Grantham, NH 03753
ph: 716-550-1106
btruax