Healthcare Consulting Services
PO Box 1230
Grantham, NH 03753
ph: 716-550-1106
btruax
Healthcare Consulting Services with a Focus on Patient Safety Solutions and Quality Improvement Across the Health Care Continuum. Your Patient Safety Resource Solution.
August 3, 2021
Obstetric Patients More At Risk for Wrong Patient Orders
We’ve done many columns on patient misidentification and wrong patient orders. There are, of course, some patient-related factors that put patients at greater risk of wrong patient events – such as having very common last names. But we’ve always presumed that patients would be equally at risk for wrong patient orders regardless of site in the healthcare system. A new study shows that may not be the case.
Kern-Goldberger and colleagues (Kern-Goldberger 2021) used the “retract-and-reorder” method (see our July 17, 2012 Patient Safety Tip of the Week “More on Wrong-Patient CPOE”) to identify near-miss wrong patient orders and compared rates of such orders among patients on obstetric units to those for reproductive-aged women admitted to medical–surgical units. They found the rate of such orders on obstetric patients was nearly double that seen on general med-surg units. The rate of retract-and-reorder events per 100,000 order sessions in obstetric units was 79.5, compared to 42.3 in the general medical–surgical population (OR 1.98). The obstetric retract-and-reorder event rate was significantly higher for attending physicians and house staff compared with advanced practice clinicians. There were no significant differences in error rates between day and night shifts.
By definition, instances found by the retract-and-reorder method did not result in actual wrong patient errors (because the error was rapidly identified and corrected). Nevertheless, they do provide a reasonable estimate of the comparable frequency of actual wrong patient order errors.
Medications most frequently subject to error in the obstetric population in this study were non-oxytocin uterotonics, nifedipine, antibiotics, opioid and non-opioid analgesics, and tocolytics. While the confidence intervals were too wide to make firm conclusions about the risks for these medication categories, they are similar to those found in other studies showing higher error rates for antibiotics, opioid analgesics, tocolytics, and magnesium sulfate in the obstetric population.
The authors discuss potential factors contributing to the higher frequency of wrong patient orders on obstetrics units. One is that the patients are similar in terms of age, sex, and reason for admission. Another is the rapidly changing clinical status of patients in labor and delivery settings. And clinicians are often entering orders for multiple patients at the same order entry sitting. Also, their order entry may be interrupted by obstetric emergencies or imminent deliveries.
In attempt to explain the disparity in wrong patient orders between physicians (attendings and residents) and advanced practice clinicians, the authors note that the physicians are more likely to be entering orders on busy labor and delivery units, whereas the advanced practice clinicians are more likely entering orders in triage, antepartum, and postpartum settings (which might be less hectic).
The study is not clear on one item – the impact of babies having the same last name as the moms. Our multiple columns on misidentification of newborns points out that newborns usually have the same last name as the moms and often share a last name with their twin or other multiple birth sibling. But given the types of medications most frequently involved, it is unlikely that those were being ordered for newborns. So, we doubt much of an impact due to babies having the same last names as moms here.
The authors suggest helping clinicians place orders without disturbance, such as adopting a mandated “no disruption” culture while orders are being placed or other safety tools to
protect physicians and advanced practice clinicians from distraction and interruption. They also suggest better balancing clinical responsibilities for all obstetric clinicians, especially house staff, to ensure adequate time and attention to enter orders safely.
They discuss other factors that frequently contribute to patiens safety issues, such as workload and clinician/patient ratio, crossover coverage and covering multiple services simultaneously, and handoffs.
They also discuss many of the interventions we’ve discussed to avoid wrong patient errors, such as requiring electronic confirmation of patient identity before signing an order, EMR-generated warnings about patients with similar names, use of patient photographs, and CDS alerts regarding high alert or common medications.
Your EMR/CPOE system should always include patient identification information on every page (fixed, so it is not lost when scrolling) and we advocate use of patient photographs in addition to the names and other identifiers. In addition, a good EMR/CPOE system will prevent drop-down lists of patients from stopping at the first search name or at least use some sort of mechanism to alert the clinician that there are more patients with the same search name. And we again caution against allowing multiple patient records to be open at the same time (that also means you need to synchronize records if you have more than one IT program running at the same time, such as CPOE and a separate radiology system).
We also strongly advocate use of the retract-and-reorder” tool as a means of identifying your vulnerabilities to wrong patient orders.
Our March 26, 2019 Patient Safety Tip of the Week “Patient Misidentification” has many recommendations on avoiding wrong patient orders, as do the multiple other columns listed below.
Some of our prior columns related to patient identification issues:
May 20, 2008 “CPOE Unintended Consequences – Are Wrong Patient Errors More Common?”
November 17, 2009 “Switched Babies”
July 17, 2012 “More on Wrong-Patient CPOE”
June 26, 2012 “Using Patient Photos to Reduce CPOE Errors”
April 30, 2013 “Photographic Identification to Prevent Errors”
August 2015 “Newborn Name Confusion”
January 12, 2016 “New Resources on Improving Safety of Healthcare IT”
January 19, 2016 “Patient Identification in the Spotlight”
August 1, 2017 “Progress on Wrong Patient Orders”
June 19, 2018 “More EHR-Related Problems”
November 2018 “More on Hearing Loss”
March 26, 2019 “Patient Misidentification”
May 21, 2019 “Mixed Message on Number of Open EMR Records”
September 10, 2019 “Joint Commission Naming Standard Leaves a Gap”
December 17, 2019 “Tale of Two Tylers”
March 24, 2020 “Mayo Clinic: How to Get Photos in Your EMR”
June 16, 2020 “Tracking Technologies”
November 17, 2020 “A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words”
Some of our prior columns related to identification issues in newborns:
November 17, 2009 “Switched Babies”
December 20, 2011 “Infant Abduction”
September 4, 2012 “More Infant Abductions”
December 11, 2012 “Breastfeeding Mixup Again”
April 8, 2014 “FMEA to Avoid Breastmilk Mixups”
August 2015 “Newborn Name Confusion”
January 19, 2016 “Patient Identification in the Spotlight”
July 19, 2016 “Infants and Wrong Site Surgery”
August 1, 2017 “Progress on Wrong Patient Orders”
March 26, 2019 “Patient Misidentification”
September 10, 2019 “Joint Commission Naming Standard Leaves a Gap”
June 16, 2020 “Tracking Technologies”
Some of our previous columns on maternal and ob/gyn issues:
February 5, 2008 “Reducing Errors in Obstetrical Care”
February 2010 “Joint Commission Sentinel Event Alert on Maternal Deaths”
April 2010 “RCA: Epidural Solution Infused Intravenously”
July 20, 2010 “More on the Weekend Effect/After-Hours Effect”
August 2010 “Surgical Case Listing Accuracy”
September 7, 2010 “Patient Safety in Ob/Gyn Settings”
January 2011 “Surgical Fires Not Just in High Risk Cases”
February 8, 2011 “Inducing Too Early”
April 2011 “Ob/Gyn Patient Safety Programs”
April 24, 2012 “Fire Hazard of Skin Preps Oxygen”
July 2012 “WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist”
December 4, 2012 “Unintentional Perioperative Hypothermia: A New Twist”
September 2013 “Full-Time Laborists Reduce C-Section Rates”
October 2013 “Challenging the 39-Week Campaign”
November 2013 “The Weekend Effect: Not One Simple Answer”
January 2014 “It MEOWS But Doesn’t Purr”
May 13, 2014 “Perioperative Sleep Apnea: Human and Financial Impact”
August 19, 2014 “Some More Lessons Learned on Retained Surgical Items”
November 3, 2015 “Medication Errors in the OR - Part 2”
February 7, 2017 “Maternal Safety Bundles”
January 23, 2018 “Unintentional Hypothermia Back in Focus”
January 8, 2019 “Maternal Mortality in the Spotlight”
December 8, 2020 “Maternal Mortality: Looking in All the Wrong Places?”
References:
Kern-Goldberger AR, Kneifati-Hayek J, Fernandes Y, et al. Wrong-Patient Orders in Obstetrics. Obstetrics & Gynecology 2021; Published online July 8, 2021
https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Fulltext/9900/Wrong_Patient_Orders_in_Obstetrics.235.aspx
Print “Obstetric Patients More At-Risk for Wrong Patient Orders”
To get "Patient Safety Tip of the Week "emailed to you, click here and enter "subscribe" in the subject field.
If you don't see the search term you expected to see here, its probably because that tip already went to our Tip of the Week Archive. We do a new tip every week. Click here to search the entire site or you can Go to Tip of the Week Archive a patient safety resource solution loaded with tips, tools, and techniques you can use in your patient safety and quality improvement initiatives. Or it may have moved to our What's New Archive.
Click here to see the consulting services and patient safety solutions that we provide.
Click on the "Contact Us" button at the left to send us your comments on our "What's New in the Patient Safety World" columns.
To get "Patient Safety Tip of the Week "emailed to you, click here and enter "subscribe" in the subject field.
August 2021
Inappropriate use of antibiotics is a problem for all patient populations, but it has long been a particular problem in pediatrics. One condition for which antibiotics are overprescribed is acute otitis media (AOM), the most-common indication for antibiotics in children. Delayed antibiotic prescribing for AOM can significantly reduce unnecessary antibiotic use and is recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics for select children. A delayed antibiotic prescription is a prescription given to the caregiver to fill in the event that the child’s symptoms worsen or fail to improve after 48 to 72 hours.
A recent study sought to improve delayed prescribing for AOM across 8 outpatient pediatric practices in Colorado. Frost et al. (Frost 2021), through a collaborative initiative with American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, implemented a low-cost 6-month antimicrobial stewardship intervention that included education, audit and feedback, online resources, and content expertise.
Practices varied by size (range: 6–37 providers), payer type, and geographic setting. Overall, 69 clinicians at 8 practice sites implemented the project.
The rate of delayed antibiotic prescribing increased from 2% at baseline to 21% at intervention end (RRR 8.96). Five practices submitted postintervention data. The rate of delayed prescribing at 3 months and 6 months postintervention remained significantly higher than baseline (RRR 3 months postintervention 8.46; 6 months postintervention 6.69.
So what, exactly, did the intervention entail? There were 3 educational sessions (a full day in-person learning session and two 90-minute virtual sessions covering the CDC Core Elements of Outpatient Antibiotic Stewardship and the Institute for Health Improvement Model of Improvement QI frameworks). There were also 4 monthly 60-minute webinars to review data and discuss PDSA cycles. There was also subject matter expert support and access to an online community collaborative Web site. CME credits and maintenance of certification (MOC) credits were also provided. Education included content on effective communication to reduce antibiotic use by using the Dialogue Around Respiratory Treatment method. All practices were provided templates for delayed prescribing-focused patient education material (handouts and posters).
Each practice site had a QI team including, at a minimum, a physician practice champion, an office administrator, and a nurse or medical assistant; required attendance at educational sessions; development and execution of monthly PDSA cycles; submission of monthly provider-level data; and completion of surveys. In total, 27 PDSA (plan-do-study-act) cycles were completed by the 8-practice teams.
We’ve often said that education and training seldom result in sustained behavioral improvement. But in this collaborative the intervention was more than just an educational one. Adoption of good QI techniques, including PDSA cycles with audit and feedback likely played a pivotal role. And, undoubtedly, the collaborative had a beneficial impact on team building and safety culture at the practice sites.
Will the results be sustainable beyond a year? Only time will tell. But we’d expect that, once parents and other caregivers have been exposed to the concept of delayed prescribing, they will look to delayed prescribing the next time their child has a bout of AOM, thus further sustaining the improvement.
Good work!
Some of our prior columns on antibiotic stewardship:
References:
Frost, HM, Monti JD, Andersen LM, et al. Improving Delayed Antibiotic Prescribing for Acute Otitis Media. Pediatrics 2021; 147(6): e2020026062
https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/147/6/e2020026062
Print “August 2021 Antibiotic Stewardship in Pediatrics”
The American College of Gastroenterology has updated guidelines on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of C. diff (Kelly 2021), its first update since 2013. Though we’ll always continue to refer to it as C. diff, the guidelines acknowledge the name change to Clostridioides difficile (it was formerly named Clostridium difficile). Overall, they make 23 GRADED recommendations for the management regarding C. diff.
While there had been a substantial increase in C. diff incidence over the first decade of this century, the estimated national burden of C. diff infection and associated hospitalizations decreased from 2011 through 2017, owing to a decline in health care–associated infections (Guh 2020). C. diff burden in long-term care facilities also saw a decrease. These suggest that efforts at reducing CDI in hospitals and other healthcare facilities have been successful.
Perhaps the most important change in the updated guidelines is inclusion of fecal microbial transplant (FMT) as a treatment for C. diff infection (CDI). But the guidelines also include new recommendations on diagnostic testing, and use of bezlotoxumab in prevention of CDI recurrence.
The guidelines cover management of all levels of severity of C. diff, from asymptomatic colonization to severe infection. Criteria for definitions of “severe” and “fulminant” CDI are included in the guideline.
Differentiating colonization from infection has been improved with adoption of new testing capabilities. The guideline notes that only individuals with symptoms suggestive of active CDI should be tested (3 or more unformed stools in 24 hours). A two-step diagnostic process is now recommended, with stool being first tested using a test with high sensitivity, such as nucleic acid amplification testing or glutamate dehydrogenase, and then followed by highly specific enzyme immunoassay.
For nonsevere CDI, either oral vancomycin or oral fidaxomicin are recommended, though the guideline also notes oral metronidazole may be used in low-risk patients.
For severe CDI, 10 days of oral vancomycin or oral fidaxomicin is recommended.
For fulminant CDI, oral vancomycin plus fluid resuscitation is recommended. Adding parenteral metronidazole is noted as an option, though the guideline notes the level of evidence for this is of low quality.
See the guideline itself for the recommended doses of the various antimicrobials in each situation discussed.
The major update is use of fecal microbial transplant (FMT) in cases of severe or fulminant CDI that are resistant to antibiotics. FMT is also now used to prevent recurrence in patient at high risk.
Prevention/prophylaxis is also discussed. Oral vancomycin prophylaxis can be used when patients with a history of CDI undergo subsequent use of systemic antibiotics. As noted above, fecal microbial transplant (FMT) can be used to prevent recurrence in patient at high risk (and may need to be repeated one or more times). Another new recommendation is for use of the monoclonal antibody bezlotoxumab for prevention of CDI recurrence in patients at high risk of recurrence.
Note that the guideline recommends against use of probiotics either in prevention of recurrent CDI or as prophylaxis in patients on antibiotic therapy, citing lack of strong evidence.
The guideline also includes recommendations for special circumstances, such as pregnancy and lactation, inflammatory bowel disease, immunocompromised states, and patients requiring surgical intervention.
We should note that there have been several other good reviews of C. diff management in recent years (Wilcox 2019, Rao 2020, Cho 2020).
The new ACG guidelines did not to make GRADE recommendations regarding infection control and prevention. Instead, they pointed to other published guidelines having comprehensive recommendations for preventing CDI. They note that clinical practice guidelines from the IDSA/SHEA and European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases recommend isolating patients with suspected or confirmed CDI, use of full barrier precautions (i.e., gowns and gloves) while caring for these patients, and hand hygiene before and after contact with patients with CDI, preferably using soap and water. They note that none of these guidelines recommend contact precautions in asymptomatic carriers. They do stress use of antibiotic stewardship programs that restrict high risk antimicrobials and minimize unnecessary antimicrobials to control rates of CDI.
Barker et al. (Barker 2020) evaluated the cost-effectiveness of infection control strategies to reduce hospital-onset C. diff infection. Interventions considered included daily sporicidal cleaning, terminal sporicidal cleaning, health care worker hand hygiene, patient hand hygiene, visitor hand hygiene, health care worker contact precautions, visitor contact precautions, C difficile screening at admission, and reduced intrahospital patient transfers. Their evaluation suggests that institutions should seek to streamline their infection control initiatives and prioritize a smaller number of highly cost-effective interventions. Daily sporicidal cleaning was among several cost-saving strategies that could be prioritized over minimally effective, costly strategies, such as visitor contact precautions.
Lastly, one problem not discussed in the updated AGS guideline is that of overtesting for C. diff. Dunn et al. (Dunn 2020) did a systematic review of studies evaluating the association between clinical decision support (CDS) alerts for CDI diagnosis and CDI testing volume and/or CDI rate. They conclude that the use of electronic alerts for diagnostic stewardship for C. difficile was associated with reductions in CDI testing, the proportion of inappropriate CDI testing, and rates of CDI in most studies. But they also noted that broader concerns related to alerts remain understudied, including unintended adverse consequences and alert fatigue.
It’s pretty clear that considerable progress has been made on reducing the burden of C. diff on our patients and our healthcare system.
Update:
Since we initially wrote this column, IDSA (Infectious Diseases Society of America) and SHEA (Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America) published their 2021 Focused Update Guidelines on Management of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Adults (Johnson 2021).
The guidelines are fairly similar, though there are a few somewhat controversial differences (Willingham 2021). Probably the biggest difference iin the choice of antimicrobial for an initial episode of C. diff infection. The IDSA/SHEA guideline update makes a “conditional” recommendation for use of fidaxomicin as first preferred choice over vancomycin. It states this recommendation is based upon efficacy and safety, with a moderate certainty of evidence, but notes “its implementation depends on available resources" (the cost of fidaxomicin is considerably higher than that for vancomycin). It does list vancomycin as an acceptable alternative.
The IDSA/SHEA guideline update also recommends fidaxomicin over a standard dose of vancomycin for recurrent CDI (again, a conditional recommendation, based on low certainty evidence). For patients with multiple recurrences, vancomycin in a tapered and pulsed regimen, vancomycin followed by rifaximin, and fecal microbiota transplantation are options in addition to fidaxomicin.
Another conditional recommendation is for patients with a recurrent CDI episode within the last six months. The IDSA/SHEA guideline update suggests using bezlotoxumab as a co-intervention along with standard of care antibiotics rather than standard of care antibiotics alone. It makes this recommendation despite a very low certainty of evidence and it does note both cost and access issues to this monoclonal antibody.
Read the guideline update itself for discussion on the rationale and recommendations for further research on each of these 3 conditional recommendations.
References:
Johnson S, Lavergne V, Skinner AM, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA): 2021 Focused Update Guidelines on Management of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Adults. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2021; Published: 24 June 2021
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab549/6298219
Willingham E. Clostridioides difficile: 2 Sets of Guidelines Disagree. Medscape Medical News 2021; July 07, 2021
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/954362
References:
Kelly CR, Fischer M, Allegretti JR, et al. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infections. Am J Gastroenterol 2021; 116(6): 1124-1147
Guh AY, Mu Y, Winston LG, et al. Trends in U.S. Burden of Clostridioides difficile Infection and Outcomes. N Engl J Med 2020; 382:1320-1330
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1910215
Wilcox MH. Updated Evidence for Optimal Management of CDI . IDSE In fectious Disease Special Edition 2019; December 5, 2019
Rao K, Malani PN. Diagnosis and Treatment of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile Infection in Adults in 2020. JAMA 2020; 323(14):1403-1404
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762806
Cho JM, Pardi DS, Sahil K. Update on Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infection. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 2020; 95(4): 758-769
https://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(19)30725-6/fulltext
Barker AK, Scaria E, Safdar N, Alagoz O. Evaluation of the Cost-effectiveness of Infection Control Strategies to Reduce Hospital-Onset Clostridioides difficile Infection. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3(8): e2012522
Dunn AN, Radakovich N, Ancker JS, et al. The Impact of Clinical Decision Support Alerts on Clostridioides difficile Testing: A Systematic Review. Clinical Infectious Diseases 2021; 72(6): 987-994 Published online February 15, 2020
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article-abstract/72/6/987/5736364?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Print “August 2021 Updated Guidelines on C. diff”
We’ve done multiple columns on the detrimental effects of red blood cell transfusions and the trend toward more restrictive transfusion guidelines (see list at the end of this column). But most of the recommendations for restricted use of transfusion have applied to non-cardiac surgery.
Now 4 specialty societies (the Society of Thoracic Surgeons, the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, the American Society of ExtraCorporeal Technology, and the Society for the Advancement of Patient Blood Management) have collaborated to publish an update to “Clinical Practice Guidelines on Patient Blood Management” (Tibi 2021). The guidelines focus on ways to minimize blood loss during cardiac surgery and reduce the need for transfusions.
The updated guidelines use the term “patient blood management” (PBM) rather than the term “blood conservation” that had been used in the prior guidelines. PBM includes managing anemia, optimizing coagulation, interdisciplinary blood conservation modalities, and patient-centered decision making in order to achieve improved patient outcomes.
The guideline calls for preoperative identification of high-risk patients and use of preoperative and perioperative measures of blood conservation. Assessment of anemia and determination of its etiology is appropriate in all patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Iron deficiency is the most common cause of anemia in this population, occurring in up to 50% of anemic patients. Treating iron-deficiency anemia should be done before surgery if time permits, and can substantially reduce the need for blood transfusion. In patients undergoing cardiac operations, it is reasonable to implement standardized transfusion protocols in order to reduce transfusion burden. Preoperative erythropoietin-stimulating agents and iron supplementation several days prior to cardiac operations to increase red cell mass can be considered in those patients at high risk for postoperative anemia or those who refuse transfusion. Phlebotomy should be minimized by reduced volume and frequency of blood sampling as a reasonable means of blood conservation. The guideline also provides recommendations for preoperative management of any antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants being used, including timing of cessation for individual agents and recommendations regarding reversal agents if needed.
It also has recommendations regarding use of antifibrinolytic agents (and also DDAVP in those patients with conditions known to respond to DDAVP). It provides guidance for various blood products and derivatives.
Red blood cell salvage is emphasized in patients on cardiopulmonary bypass. Centrifugation of pump-salvaged blood is reasonable for minimizing post- cardiopulmonary bypass allogeneic red blood cell transfusion.
Regarding volume replacement, the guideline states it is reasonable to administer human albumin after cardiac surgery to provide intravascular volume replacement and minimize the need for transfusion. But hydroxyethyl starch is not recommended as a volume expander in cardiopulmonary bypass patients because it may increase the risk of bleeding.
Another recommendation is to use “retrograde autologous priming”, in which the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit is primed with the patient’s own blood. That technique has been shown to reduce transfusion rates.
Regarding transfusion strategies, the guideline states “In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, a restrictive perioperative allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategy is recommended in preference to a liberal transfusion strategy for perioperative blood conservation, as it reduces both transfusion rate and units of allogeneic RBCs without increased risk for mortality or morbidity.” It also notes that allogeneic RBC transfusion is unlikely to improve oxygen transport when the hemoglobin concentration is greater than 10 g/dL and is not recommended.
The guideline further recommends that a multidisciplinary team of health care providers should be part of any patient blood management program to limit utilization of blood resources and decrease the risk of bleeding.
Read the full guideline to see grading of the evidence for each of the recommendations and good discussions on the rationale for each.
Prior columns on potential detrimental effects related to red blood cell transfusions:
References:
Tibi P, McClure RS, Huang J, et al. STS/SCA/AmSECT/SABM Update to the Clinical Practice Guidelines on Patient Blood Management. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2021; Published online: June 30, 2021
https://www.annalsthoracicsurgery.org/article/S0003-4975(21)00556-7/fulltext
Print “August 2021 New Blood Management Guidelines for Cardiac Surgery”
We’ve done many columns supporting improved nursing staffing, not only to make the lives of our dedicated nurses better, but also as a means to improve patient safety. A year ago we reported on NY State legislative activities on this issue (see our September 1, 2020 Patient Safety Tip of the Week “NY State and Nurse Staffing Issues”).
Well, NY State finally did pass legislation on nursing staffing and the bill was recently signed into law by the governor (Reisman 2021, AP Staff 2021). But it’s not quite what was originally envisioned.
The previously proposed legislation would have mandated specific nurse:patient ratios for various healthcare venues.
The law that was recently enacted creates staffing committees at New York hospitals to assess guidelines for per patient staffing levels. Hospitals will be required to form committees composed of registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, ancillary staff members providing direct patient care, and hospital administrators to form the staffing plans. Plans must be adopted and submitted to the NYS Department of Health by July 1, 2022.
While hospital opposition to mandated nursing staffing issues largely killed prior proposed legislation, the realities created by the COVID-19 pandemic forced the legislature to finally act.
This is certainly a step in the right direction, but we’ll have to take a look in a year to see what sort of staffing plans get approval.
Some of our other columns on nursing workload and missed nursing care/care left undone:
November 26, 2013 “Missed Care: New Opportunities?”
May 9, 2017 “Missed Nursing Care and Mortality Risk”
March 6, 2018 “Nurse Workload and Mortality”
May 29, 2018 “More on Nursing Workload and Patient Safety”
October 2018 “Nurse Staffing Legislative Efforts”
February 2019 “Nurse Staffing, Workload, Missed Care, Mortality”
July 2019 “HAI’s and Nurse Staffing”
September 1, 2020 “NY State and Nurse Staffing Issues”
February 9, 2021 “Nursing Burnout”
References:
Reisman N. New laws will address staffing levels in New York hospitals. Spectrum News 2021; June 21, 2021
Associated Press Staff. New York Law Gives Nurses a Voice in Hospital Staffing Plans. Medscape Medical News 2021; June 21, 2021
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/953464
Print “August 2021 The New NY State Law on Nursing Staffing”
Print “August 2021 What's New in the Patient Safety World (full column)”
Print “August 2021 Antibiotic Stewardship in Pediatrics”
Print “August 2021 Updated Guidelines on C. diff”
Print “August 2021 New Blood Management Guidelines for Cardiac Surgery”
Print “August 2021 The New NY State Law on Nursing Staffing”
Go to the "Whats New Archive"
To get "What's New in the Patient Safety World"emailed to you,click here and enter "subscribe" in the subject field.
To get "What's New in the Patient Safety World"emailed to you,click here and enter "subscribe" in the subject field.
Copyright 2012 The Truax Group Healthcare Consulting Patient Safety Solutions Tools Tips & Resources. All rights reserved.
PO Box 1230
Grantham, NH 03753
ph: 716-550-1106
btruax